People talk about Alexander being better than Bradley, but against Witter...

Bradley completely outboxed Witter and was barely tagged. Not to mention the fact that Witter hadn't been beat since Zab Judah several years ago, and was considered the top guy aside from Hatton at 140.

In fact, many favored him over Hatton.

Witter could not figure out Bradley at all and the fact that he got a split decision was ridiculous, and if it wasn't for the viscious knock down, and it was viscious, Bradley would have been robbed.

On the other hand, Alexander made Witter quit, who claimed his elbow hurt, yet looked very hittable and was in a more competitive fight from a boxing perspective.

So, why are people favoring Alexander over Bradley when he's not as slick, not as versatile as he's basically a mid range fighter, and seems to only have size and power over Bradley who is a more complete fighter.

Not to mention the fact that Bradley has proved it against fighters like Cherry, Witter who he looked better against, Holt, Campbell, and Peterson.

To be honest, I think Peterson would have a very good chance to beat Alexander, as he looks like he has a warrior mentality in the sense that while Bradley was dominanting on the cards, every round was very close, and he fought hard until the final bell, showing amazing athleticism and versatility.

In fact, Alexander who is a mid range fighter would have big problems getting inside on Peterson, which is something Alexander has not shown that he can do, while Bradley has shown the ability to fight both on the outside and inside.

So, again, why is Alexander rated higher than Bradley at this point?

Instead of fighting Kotelneck or whatever his name is, Alexander should fight Peterson if he wants to make a name for himself in the division.

But he wont because he will lose this fight.

 

I agree, and people are automatically assuming that I guess based on his win over Urango, who has very limited boxing ability and a one dimensional skillset, they think he's at the top of the division when he clearly hasn't earned the spot.

Bradley could have chosen an opponent like Kotelneck too, but instead he's been fighting much stearner opposition.

 

Let's be reasonable in this assessment.

Peterson is much more athletic than Kotelnik. He has faster hands, far better agility, and more range.

Not to mention that he's more versatile. He would probably win every round against Kotelnik.

Nobody even thinks this fight is going to be competitive, but against Peterson, many people would think that Peterson has a legitimate chance to win.

They may not favor Peterson, but they wouldn't be shocked if he won.

Kotelnik, does anyone actually think this guy has a chance at all?

 

You don't know **** about boxing.

Alexander was taking punches way more than Bradley was.

Bradley was winning every round in my opinion too. The fact that the scorecards were even close shows a hometown bias.

Bradley fought an incredibly smart fight and Witter could barely land on him.

Bradley attacked Witter to the body early with jabs and hooks, and found a spot for his right hand later on in the fight.

Witter was confused and looked off balance.

I doubt you even saw either of the fights. You're just a typical dick rider who doesn't know **** about boxing.

Alexander is more hittable than Bradley. Obviously you didn't watch the fight at all because you woudln't have seen the scorecards were bull****.

Stop commetning on my threads.