People underestimating Shane

Yeah cause Roach always says what he believes. PBF's legs are gone man! Guy is shot! He's fragile at welter weight isn't he?

 

That's has nothing to do with the point I'm making. I already predicted that's what you were gonna say because you would have no counter for that. There's none, so don't bother trying.

 

Dude I said that because you are not saying anything of substance. 147 ODLH was an entirely different animal than 147 SSM. If you feel it is "hating" to point that out? You have an entire different set of issues. I saw where you were going coupled with your past history... I just LIG. :roll:

 

Shane's shot. DLH was weight drained but not as shot as Shane. He did well enough vs PBF at 154. He didn't even have trouble making the weight for the Pacquiao fight (unless you believe Roach's word just for this one right :hey) Shane had more trouble making the weight. But ok, DLH was more weight drained. But Shane was more shot, and it has been clear since the Cotto fight, he looked shot vs Mayorga too and the Margarito fight? Margarito the guy not getting credit for loading his gloves and being a punch bag from most Floyd fans? Interesting.

Shane's a fighter who depends too much on his speed, reflexes, they are gone and against a fast fighter like PBF, he's pretty much finished. Yeah I mean Roy looked great vs Lacy too.

"If you feel it is hating to point that out, then you have an entire different set of issues". :good

 

Are you going to honestly sit and try and tell me that the Oscar that Pac fought was better than the Shane that PBF fought? I know you're not trying to say that bull**** are you?atsch

 

You look like a ****ing idiot in this thread as usual.:good You said Shane wouldn't be easy work for PBF and he would test PBF. PBF comes out puts on a boxing clinic shuts him out and you say after the fight Shane was shot and you don't give him any credit for the win.

 

Oscar needed IV's you idiot.

 

Honestly Shane was better BUT he has been in decline for like 5 years, remember when he came back down to WW after the Winky fights, he looked bad than the Vargas fights were supposed to be his going away fights but he kept fighting than he lost to Cotto who is a good BUT would never have beaten a PRIME Mosley. Mosley can still somewhat handle himself because he is a great athlete, very strong and durable but he is over the hill kinda like a 2000/2001 Holyfield still a threat but over the Hill.

As for Oscar he was over the hill as much himself but when he came down in weight he was really ****, people actually thought Forbes was a good fighter because he hung in there with Oscar, but Berto showed us the truth. Oscar than went on to get TKO'd as I predicted. Oscar wasn't just over the Hill, he was completely shot like Tyson.

Overall Oscar was clearly more Shot and Over the hill, But Mosley is almost 39, he can still fight but he is no where near prime and is over the hill as well.

 

That's right. You were wrong about this and you'll be wrong consistently about everything else you post because you don't know wtf your talking about. Floyd doesn't need credit from a clueless keyboard banger such as yourself. As far as that goes their are people that will occasionally agree with you, but until you pull head out of your ass and tone down the stupid, the only thing anyone will appreciate you for is as a convenient punching bag.

 

you change your mind?

 

Money May, it's a slick boxing thing

 

More like an old Mosley. Pac had the same Mosley running for his life :deal

 

Your boy's offense is so great that he can't figure out how to fire at moving targets.

Mosley wasn't worried about his life, he wanted to keep his face pretty to **** his wife