People who keep saying BoxNation is smashing Sky

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Solaris, Apr 28, 2013.


  1. ButeTheBeast

    ButeTheBeast Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,866
    1,549
    May 27, 2012
    BoxNation have Bunce, He is the main difference between Sky and Boxnation

    Can you imagine any of Sky's pundits having a open conversation with brother Shaddique live on TV?
     
  2. ero-sennin

    ero-sennin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,206
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    This whole boxnation vs sky thing is embarrassing. You'd think half the forum must have shares in either of the two companies the way they cheerlead/take shots/constantly compare the two.
     
  3. Marlow

    Marlow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    1
    May 5, 2010
    They choose not to see it.

    People on here love to whinge about something, we finally have Boxing easily accessible and without having to **** around with streams and still people find something to moan about.

    It seems no two people/groups can be doing a good job, if one is doing well the other must be ****.

    Boxnation keep providing excellent international content and Sky keep delivering the biggest domestic fighters, happy days.
     
  4. Marlow

    Marlow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    1
    May 5, 2010
    Bunce is a shell of what he used to be.
     
  5. USA Rob

    USA Rob Boxing Addict banned

    5,610
    0
    Dec 22, 2012
    The OP makes a fair point. But this is boring now.

    BoxNation do the bare minimum for its subscribers. Long term there business plan is so flawed.

    Sky are building boxers not fights. Mayweather v Hatton was huge because so many peolle has seen Mayweather v Gatti, De La Houa etc. If Burns were to fight Broner nobody would really no who he is so the fights not big.
     
  6. richard mossley

    richard mossley Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,101
    1
    May 7, 2009
    Just said that a few posts back, it means in terms of quality of fights Boxnation and last week channel 5 are outperforming Sky.
     
  7. elbrujito

    elbrujito Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,574
    0
    Mar 17, 2012
    :happy
     
  8. Mugsy

    Mugsy Guest

    another eddie hearn disciple. just because he wrote to you on twitter.....:oops:

    YAWN
     
  9. USA Rob

    USA Rob Boxing Addict banned

    5,610
    0
    Dec 22, 2012
    What are you talking about? Where did I mention Hearn? Did you even read my post??
     
  10. Mugsy

    Mugsy Guest

    you're pro hearn/sky sports and i just cant understand it. there are too many people here with agendas that are so obvious.
     
  11. Dicky Anderson

    Dicky Anderson Member Full Member

    210
    0
    Oct 20, 2012
    Not planning on getting involved in another tedious thread but say there was a dedicated football channel. Would it be better than sky? I don't think so, in fact I'm sure of it because you would still expect sky to get more than their fair share of the big games. The argument doesn't really stand up. It is a dedicated sports channel
     
  12. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    5
    Nov 7, 2009
    Which brings in more revenue to Sky? Boxing or football?
     
  13. USA Rob

    USA Rob Boxing Addict banned

    5,610
    0
    Dec 22, 2012
    This is where the OP's point is valid. BoxNation is a dedicated Boxing channel, they should show more Boxing than Sky.

    And Channel 5 have shown one half decent fight this year. Lets not get ahead of ourselves.

    If Hearn posted on here, he would post as Eddie Hearn. Not some alt.
     
  14. USA Rob

    USA Rob Boxing Addict banned

    5,610
    0
    Dec 22, 2012
    I was critical of Sky in my post? Did you even read or or just see my name and post ****? That sounds like an agenda to me!
     
  15. Mugsy

    Mugsy Guest

    You're posting vague and inane ramblings. In fact at no point in your incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought.