BoxNation have Bunce, He is the main difference between Sky and Boxnation Can you imagine any of Sky's pundits having a open conversation with brother Shaddique live on TV?
This whole boxnation vs sky thing is embarrassing. You'd think half the forum must have shares in either of the two companies the way they cheerlead/take shots/constantly compare the two.
They choose not to see it. People on here love to whinge about something, we finally have Boxing easily accessible and without having to **** around with streams and still people find something to moan about. It seems no two people/groups can be doing a good job, if one is doing well the other must be ****. Boxnation keep providing excellent international content and Sky keep delivering the biggest domestic fighters, happy days.
The OP makes a fair point. But this is boring now. BoxNation do the bare minimum for its subscribers. Long term there business plan is so flawed. Sky are building boxers not fights. Mayweather v Hatton was huge because so many peolle has seen Mayweather v Gatti, De La Houa etc. If Burns were to fight Broner nobody would really no who he is so the fights not big.
Just said that a few posts back, it means in terms of quality of fights Boxnation and last week channel 5 are outperforming Sky.
you're pro hearn/sky sports and i just cant understand it. there are too many people here with agendas that are so obvious.
Not planning on getting involved in another tedious thread but say there was a dedicated football channel. Would it be better than sky? I don't think so, in fact I'm sure of it because you would still expect sky to get more than their fair share of the big games. The argument doesn't really stand up. It is a dedicated sports channel
This is where the OP's point is valid. BoxNation is a dedicated Boxing channel, they should show more Boxing than Sky. And Channel 5 have shown one half decent fight this year. Lets not get ahead of ourselves. If Hearn posted on here, he would post as Eddie Hearn. Not some alt.
I was critical of Sky in my post? Did you even read or or just see my name and post ****? That sounds like an agenda to me!
You're posting vague and inane ramblings. In fact at no point in your incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought.