People's reaction to Froch - Dirrell

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by newby johnson, Oct 21, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,827
    3
    May 19, 2007
    On this point, we agree.

    I had it 6-5-1.
     
    BlueApollo, Oct 21, 2009
    BlueApollo, Oct 21, 2009
    #16
  2. MAYLO

    MAYLO Active Member Full Member

    817
    0
    May 21, 2009
    I can not for the life of me find where people find 5 or 6 rounds to give to Froch. He hardly landed 5 or 6 punches!
     
    MAYLO, Oct 21, 2009
    MAYLO, Oct 21, 2009
    #17
  3. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    Dirrell was definitely the better fighter
    However 6-6 means Froch wins - owing to the point deduction
     
    PugilisticPower, Oct 21, 2009
    PugilisticPower, Oct 21, 2009
    #18
  4. newby johnson

    newby johnson Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,147
    78
    Jun 25, 2009
    lol he thought you were parodying me

    ...

    Whoever said Dirrell threw himself to a knee is right, and that should have been ruled a kd (because he did it to avoid getting hit). Dirrell was dirty, too, but only after Froch threw more dirty punches than he did clean ones. Dirrell came into the fight with the full intention of fighting a clean fight.

    After you substract the roughhouse stuff, Froch landed a few jabs and a whole lot of nothing.
     
    newby johnson, Oct 22, 2009
    newby johnson, Oct 22, 2009
    #19
  5. Boxfan1

    Boxfan1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,813
    4
    Dec 17, 2005
    Besides discusting, it also disgested me to the point of nauseam.
     
    Boxfan1, Oct 22, 2009
    Boxfan1, Oct 22, 2009
    #20
Page 2 of 2