Pep Vs Pac at 126

:-(-((Wow. I'd give your pov's an asskicking from hell but, you seem to be doing a fine enough job yourself.

:thinkIt really makes me wonder if you are truly serious or just playing the part of a blind nutterus huggeramus with the level of absurdity and lack of actual depth in your posts.

Oh and something to chew on besides pac's pubes for you, the question is can pac PERFORM as well in the era of same day weigh ins not can he make the weight.

DUUUUURRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Meaningless comment... good when you have run out of any real argument. :good

 

:thumbsup

 

He is making a fool of himself. When you have 5,000 posts you get the title, he thinks I gave it to myself. atsch

 

He fought Saddler many times... How many times he won??? Is he impressive??? I saw the fight it's dirty & Boring.

There's a reason why Pac is rated # 2 P4P today. And Pac has the ability to overshadow those 2 Greats featherweight if he can beat more Bigger HOF fighters like Hatton & PBF.

 

Which goes a good way towards disputing your last point.

 

this is a ****ing moron who once told me that pinoys have to travel a couple of kilometers to get a internet hook up

so i'll never forget this ****** puma. he got a brain with a size of a pea and hatred for pac so bad i guess it must be because his heroes were raped by pac and he is as always getting owned in an argument :yep :yep

look at this guys post about the pac. so dont waste arguing with this ******. just a waste of time :fire

 

He beat Saddler once out of 4 when past his prime, and was winning the last fight before it was stopped. Think the fight was dirty and boring all you want, I think Pac is a very unskilled boxer technically and would've been beaten by a prime Morales(like he already was) and will lose to Marquez. Most greats between 122 and 130 would beat him.

So how is being rated #2 P4P today better than being rated in the top 10 P4P of all time? Pac is not even top 50 all time P4P. And if you honestly think Pac could beat Hatton or especially Floyd, your "expert analysis" would certainly be in question, to put it as politely as possible.

You consider yourself an expert because you called Donaire to beat that overrated goon Darchinyan, good for you. Let's see how great your expertise is when Donaire fights Mijares.

 

Does anyone else feel this way when it comes to Sour pee?

 

Johnco is even worse than PacDBest.

 

You've been stripped of the liberty of calling anyone a ****** ages ago.

 

Indeed. At least PacDbest tries to argue in some constructive albiet biased way as to Pac winning his fantasy matchups.

Sour Pee is in need of proffesional help.

 

Johnco's entire reason for following the sport of boxing is Manny Pacquiao. His entire reason for getting up in the morning is Manny Pacquiao.

 

Oh and the names I highlighted don't matter. I find it inconsistant with your logic since you criticize Mayweathers recent opposition.

And the other part highlighted? See, everyone has an opinion. But they are not based on the same thing. See, many of use look at a fight, then both fighters, and try to decide based on styles how the fight would go. You look at a fight with Pacquiao and try to decipher how best to downplay the other fighter or boost Pacquiao in a fantastic way so that you can have a semi plausible argument. Sometimes it's about speed and power, others you turn him into a great technician, others you mention some devastating right hand that he has rarely shown. Point is, we know you're opinion before you say it. It's always the same with different variations. And believe me, you're no expert. You get some fights right and some wrong, just like the rest of us.

 

:thinkIt's quite sad really. Even Pac would blush at how this individual embarasses himself.

Pac is a beast but last i checked, he was not undefeated nor unbeatable.

Styles make fights and some just dont favor pac and we point that out respectfully in fantasy matchups. Thank you for the help the other day in the lounge. Will never forget that.:thumbsup