Pernell Whitaker: Most Underated Boxer on ESB By a Landslide

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by acb, May 10, 2008.


  1. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    No doubt in my mind that Pernell Whitaker, when judged by what he brought to the sport in talent and achievement in comparison to the credit he gets on this forum, is very underated.

    This seems odd in a forum which has so much admiration for Floyd Mayweather Jr., being that Whitaker fought a brilliant defensive style and beat better competition. And, to add to this, it wasn't long ago that he did so.

    I am not a huge fan of Pernell in the way of him brining great enthusiasm to watch. But I am in the sense of recognizing his talent and abilities as a master craftsman. He is a boxer that would perhaps trouble as many fighters across the weight classes he fought as anyone I can think of with the exeption of Hearns.

    Yet, he isn't talked about with near the reverance that his greatness should merit.
     
  2. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    [YT]MLgYA--Tvow[/YT]
     
  3. peter5

    peter5 Marco.A.Barrera Full Member

    3,727
    3
    May 7, 2007
    He is a legend, plain and simple, anyone who thinks otherswise does not know what they are talking about
     
  4. Kaz_187

    Kaz_187 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,945
    1
    Mar 19, 2006
    not by me awesome boxer
     
  5. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    [YT]CWh0lVaE1A0&feature=related[/YT]
     
  6. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    I see a lot of praise for Whitaker and some people who criminally underrate him.

    One thing I need to get off my chest is the belief (according to some) that the Hatton win for Mayweather is better than the first McGirt win for Whitaker. It's not. McGirt was a legitimate welterweight title holder who was ranked in the top 5 pound for pound. Hatton was a 140 pounder moving up and was never an elite fighter to begin with.

    I rank Whitaker number one H2H at lightweight and at light welterweight. I feel he beats both Duran and Pryor.
     
  7. JC2006

    JC2006 Active Member Full Member

    1,336
    0
    Dec 3, 2005
    I agree.
     
  8. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Not that Whitaker would beat Hearns(or even come that close) at WW, but I actually consider Whitaker at his best(Lightweight) to be even more of a stylistic dilemma than Hearns at WW and JMW in a P4P sense. I feel this way because, while both of them were near impossible to outbox, Whitaker was at his best against pressure fighters and was a fantastic inside fighter, whereas that was Hearn's weakness.
     
  9. peter5

    peter5 Marco.A.Barrera Full Member

    3,727
    3
    May 7, 2007
    I actually agree, although I do think Duran could have beaten him, I rate him that highly. I also dont rate Pryor highly, H2H (Prime) maybe, but as for ATG status, not highly at all, Arguello was too high in weight to effectively beat a fighter like Pryor. I think he gets a lot of credit for the 2 arguello fights, not undeserved, but needs to be taken into context with his whole career.
     
  10. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    People underrate his offense, too. Had a high punch output as a lightweight, could throw every punch in the book, and scored some spectacular knockouts. Probably one of the best jabs in boxing history.
     
  11. Dunks

    Dunks Absolute Grandmaster Full Member

    7,771
    0
    Jan 5, 2008

    He is one of the best boxers i have ever seen with my own eyes:bbb

    I wonder what his career woulda been like had he not been JERKED OFF by the judges in the De La Hoya fight!!
     
  12. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    I think a lot of Pryor's greatness has to do with his dominance and the fact that he looked unbeatable in his prime at the weight, no so much for his overall resume. I think a fight between he and Whitaker at 140 is pretty difficult to call. I'd actually give him a better chance of beating Pea at 140 than Duran at 135, as odd as that may sound.
     
  13. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    And this is what I mean by underated... Pernell represents the ultimate puzzle. How does one beat him?

    Its clear you can't outbox him. You can't really preasure him because he is so effective off the back foot. Forget about outjabbing him because his jab was as consistant as it was good. And your not going to win with by way of activity, because Pernell was always an active fighter. Body punching, Pernell did that too. Ring intelligence, your not going to get the best of him this way either, he is a thinking fighter.
     
  14. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    What was with you that one time when you said Trinidad and De La Hoya beat a prime Whitaker?:lol:
     
  15. peter5

    peter5 Marco.A.Barrera Full Member

    3,727
    3
    May 7, 2007
    I agree,in his prime he looked unbeatable, and his Victories over arguello cemented his legacy if you like.H2H I rate Pryor highly, but ATG status I dont rank him as highly. That might sound like a contradiction, but Its actually not. In essence Im in agreement with you Sweetpea.

    Whats you thoughts on him fighting duran, hearns and leonard and the outcomes? however speculative they may be?