Pernell Whitaker or Sumbu Kalambay: more skilled?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Flo_Raiden, Jul 11, 2013.


  1. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,602
    29,160
    Oct 12, 2010
    Between these 2 boxing maestros who do you think had better boxing ability and versatility overall?
     
  2. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    Whitaker had more versatility, because he could be comfortable toe-to-toe and in-the-pocket even with fighters much naturally bigger/stronger.

    Defensively, however, I feel Whitaker was more athletic talent rather than technical skill. I feel he relied on speed, reflexes and range of movement more, whereas Sumbu was all judgement and timing of motion, and the better counter-puncher. Only Benitez countered as well as Kalambay, and possibly Toney at his very best at times.