Pernell Whitaker Says Beating Pac Would Be Easy

NO one is saying just anyone,, Pac is one of the very few (ever) that would have a shot at doing so,, I think Oscar kind of did that,:think Im not saying Whittaker didnt get the best of him on many exchanges,, But there were lot of periods (too many) where i think Pac posed,and played too much.. While Oscar was pressing the fight...

Like i said in an earlier post i could just as easily see Whittaker frustrating the hell out of Pac and make him look bad.. . On the other hand i can see a kamikaze,combined with hard punching Pac who is at leeast as fast as Whittaker(at WW). Being alot for Whittaker to handle.. I can see either scenario happening here.

 

Judah will be showcasing the Chickendance II.

 

Whitaker certainly had the defensive skills and variety in his game to frustrate Pac. But Judah? lol

Zab Judah is the last fighter I'd think of that could beat Manny Pacquiao. Judah gets stopped 100 times out of 100 against current Pac. He basically is a one trick pony trying to land that left, which an intelligent, well-trained fighter like Pac does not get caught with, and Judah's defence is not great and extremely overrated. He's been beat up bad or knocked out by every elite opponent he's faced, besides Spinks who couldn't bust a grape. In his last fight he was getting hit with big shots by Mabuza.

Whitaker must be back on the crack.

 

But, Max Kellerman said Judah was Sweet Pea with power....:rofl:roflatschatsch

 

Cotto and Clottey both beat Zab though...Interesting.

 

Well actually you are agreeing with me . I said it was about even for at least the first half of the fight... You just said you gave him the 1,2,and maybe the 6th... well that would make it an even fight at mid point... Actually i havent watched the fight in years, so i dont exactly remember which particular rounds,,All i know is he came out fast and won more early rounds than Pernell.,, I neveer said the decision wasnt a bad one, what i did say was that Pernell wasnt dominant.. You dont lose 4 or 5 rounds and consider it a dominant win.

Pernells big rounds were more decisive than Chavez's maybe thats why you feel he was dominant.. But he never knocked him down or had him in any trouble, and no shut out or even close to one. If he did that then irt would be dominant.... You wanna see dominant wins from Pernell watch most of his Lw reign ,when he rarely lost rounds, not one where ha lost at least 4 rounds.

I would have liked to see this fight at Lw, or even a couple years before at Jw.. Some think he always has Juliios number, but he was never a WW and although still great his partying was already catching up with him and he was on the slide.. We saw a big drop in his abilities in his fights right after this. Pick em match at Lw or Jw.

 

ha ha **** thats great

 

judah is a poor mans version of whitaker. A prime whitaker would beat pac but i give judah no shot at any point in his career.

 

Disagree, pea had the footwork, defense, and most important "the best jab" i have ever seen!

 

First, Pernell lost to the most one-dimensional fighter I ever seen in Tito.

Second, focused Judah would lose to Bobby Pacquiao.

End of.

 

Pete dominated chavez and beat oscar with his jab. CLEARLY!

 

An ignorant thing to say, JCC is a more well-rounded fighter than Pacquaio.

Robinson, Napoles, SRL, Tommy Hearns?

 

Really? Pac wouldve KOd Meldrick Taylor in the first round it would be ridiculous. atsch

 

Okay *******. By the way, more well-rounded doesn't necessarily mean better. atsch

 

You are forgetting Pac's best weapon, What he does in exchanges.
I Don't care how slick you are, You cannot dodge a punch when you yourself is committed and in the middle of throwing a punch.

It's a matter of who cracks first at that moment.