Pernell Whitaker V Meldrick Taylor - Early 1992??

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Jan 29, 2020.


Who wins?

  1. Whitaker?

    90.9%
  2. Taylor?

    9.1%
  1. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,560
    36,121
    Jan 8, 2017
    This fight could have taken place early 1992 at welter. At this point both had just the one loss and this was before Taylor began his rapid decline as such. So 12 rounds of boxing at welter weight between two hugely skilled fighters, who wins?
     
  2. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,100
    15,580
    Dec 20, 2006
    I would likely have picked Taylor at the time, but I think Whitaker would likely take an 8-4 type of decision
     
    Fergy and Pat M like this.
  3. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,939
    Nov 21, 2009
    Goodnight sweet boxing fans!!!!!! Snorrrrrrre. Snorrrrrrrre..
     
  4. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,831
    13,124
    Oct 20, 2017
    Pre-Chavez Taylor against Whitaker at 140 would be very close. By 1992, I'd pick Whitaker comfortably.
     
    Pat M, Seamus and Brixton Bomber like this.
  5. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,832
    6,599
    Dec 10, 2014
    At that juncture, Pernell had just stepped up to 140 lbs and beat the durable and skilled fringe contender Harold Brazier.

    Meldrick was at 147 lbs. since 1991.

    Still, I think Pernell would outslick Taylor for a UD.
     
  6. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,832
    6,599
    Dec 10, 2014
    I would think someone like yourself, who prides himself as being an "expert" would appreciate the subtleties of elite boxers.

    Anyway, I can think of more boring matchups.

    For example it was talked about matching Whitaker with a faded Camacho around 1993-1994. Now, that would have been a snooze fest.
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2020
    Seamus likes this.
  7. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,799
    11,420
    Aug 22, 2004
    Whitaker had a gift for neutralizing attacks; not just defending against and slipping punches but making fighters hesitate to commit. Meldrick throws a lot early and wins a couple of those rounds through sheer activity, but Whitaker levels out the aggression around the fourth and costs to a comfortable decision.
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,560
    46,152
    Feb 11, 2005
    What are you talking about?

    This would be an excellent match-up of skill and talent.... and would have been even better a year or 18 months earlier if Pea could have come up in weight.

    By 1992, Pernell would have too much left for Meldrick and wins a decision, shaking him a couple times with hard lefts.
     
    Fergy and Pat M like this.
  9. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,109
    25,265
    Jan 3, 2007
    Even at their respective bests I’d go with Whitaker. By 1992 Meldrick was already fading and frankly I don’t think he ever fully recovered from the first Chavez fight physically or mentally.
     
  10. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Whitaker, prime for prime or at this juncture. Would be more competitive than close.