Pernell Whitaker vs Featherweights

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ushvinder, Nov 24, 2012.


  1. ushvinder

    ushvinder Active Member Full Member

    646
    1
    Oct 30, 2012
    We saw Ray Leonard lose to a lightweight like duran. Is there a featherweight that can beat whitaker at 135? Personally, i think sweet pea would have given arguello and sanchez boxing lessons. Do you guys think there is a featherweight that can beat him?
     
  2. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Armstrong would have the best chance.

    Saldivar would have a shot too, but is a little too small.

    Tony Canzoneri, Ismael Laguna and Willie Pep could get it done perhaps.
     
  3. Beer

    Beer New Member Full Member

    36
    0
    Nov 12, 2012
    Armstrong is the only one, I'd say.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,212
    21,714
    Sep 15, 2009
    My first thought was Armstrong.

    I'd favour pea but if anyone can do it, it's hank.
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    No way is any featherweight beating Pea, Armstrong included
     
  6. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Willie Pep might have been able to outbox him, in fact these 2 might very well be the top 2 best pure boxers ever caught on film & with Whitaker not being a massive puncher, his size difference might not play as big of a part as say a LW Duran`s would. Pep might be the one boxer that can outbox Whitaker, he`d have the speed & movement advantage vs Pea & Pea would make it his point to beat Pep skill for skill rather than force his size on him.

    I`m not saying I think Pep would win but I think he has the best shot of any FW due to skill & style.
     
  7. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    Size difference matters for pure boxer versus pure boxer too, remember Pep lost to Angott at LW
     
  8. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Angott was no pure boxer. Willie Joyce was, and Pep beat him.

    So long as height/reach aren't factors, natural weight difference in pure boxer match ups don't matter that much.

    That said, I can actually see Whitaker walking down Pep and trying to take him out, like he did Hurtdao if he finds himself losing.

    Don't think he would though...
     
  9. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,402
    3,870
    Jun 28, 2009
    Yeah I'd agree with you.

    I reckon that Elorde fully motivated and at his best would have given Pea a cracking fight if he was able to knock off the cigs and booze for a bit, especially if the fight was in the Phillipines. Fast, very complete southpaw and an excellent ring general who wouldn't be too small, though he didn't have the biggest punch on him.

    Lockridge has a good style too but wasn't really proven at lightweight, plus Pea would probably be able to more than hold his own up close.

    I was thinking that Driscoll might have had the tools to do well even if he didn't win, although Whitaker would perhaps just decide to walk him down behind the jab instead and work him at close range rather than trying to box him.
     
  10. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,554
    Jul 28, 2004
    Angott was a negative type defensive spoiler..far from a pure boxer.
     
  11. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    No way is any pure boxer keeping Armstrong off him, Pea included.