Pernell Whitaker Vs Ike Quartey At WW

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sas6789, Jul 30, 2013.


  1. sas6789

    sas6789 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,662
    107
    Sep 15, 2011
    Prime for prime, who wins?
     
  2. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    Ike would keep the scorecards close with a better workrate, but he still loses on all the cards.

    Something like 115-113, or 116-112.
     
  3. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,316
    11,705
    Mar 19, 2012
    Whitaker was too good of an all around boxer for Quartey. Ike had that nice jab and it carried pop but I think SweetPea wouldnt let him set himself. Whitaker would keep giving him angles and countering with crisp shots.

    Ike was too predictable to beat Whitaker.

    Now if Pea is a little diminished like anything post `95 then maybe Quartey could put him on the canvas a couple of times as Pernell got sloppy at that point his career.
     
  4. patscorpio

    patscorpio Active Member Full Member

    1,335
    1
    Dec 17, 2005
    I agree with this..big fan of both fighters
     
  5. Primebeatz

    Primebeatz New Member Full Member

    96
    0
    Feb 8, 2012
    Im not sure... the way a lot of Pernells fights were scored indicate a high workrate was all you needed to beat him (on the cards). If Ike kept him at bay with the jab it could be a toss up. Thats only if they fought when they were supposed to ( in the late 90s i think). In the primes, Whitaker would outwork Ike and win a very boring decision.