Perspective on Wlad, and the HW division

He breeds pit bulls, and he once told the media that he used to let them fight, but not hard or for too long. (as though that was okay)

I'm going to assume that he's fought his dogs over the years. But I don't know if that's the case.

 

Not that I have to justify myself to a guy like you, but that's complete nonsense.

It's not my fault that you mistake criticism for hate.

It's not my fault that you're not knowledgeable of past eras.

Again, I have given GG a ton of credit over the years. I've spent hours arguing/debating that an Andre Ward fight wasn't viable, even though I'm a huge fan of Andre's. I've spent hours arguing/debating over the GBP/Canelo negotiations. I've spent hours arguing/debating his career path and his resume. I've defended him for not having moved up to SMW etc. I have zero issue with him. I am a big fan of his. The issue, is with an element of his hardcore fan base who make silly comments.

Regarding Joe, yes, I get drawn into debating his career. I'm guilty of that. But at the end of the day, you and all of the other usual suspects are always on those same threads. But I only join in when his hardcore fans type nonsense that simply isn't true. That's when I step in. And when I step in, I come with facts that never get refuted. If people didn't write silly things, I wouldn't comment. Other than that, I'm cool. I often give him props, and I always give honest opinions on fantasy fights. I'm one of only a handful of people who thinks he could have beaten Sergey Kovalev. My only gripe with Joe, is that he kidded to the media, and he regularly contradicted himself throughout his career. Now if I truly hated him, I wouldn't give him any credit, and I'd make threads about him on a regular basis. Yet I don't. And if you don't agree with my comments, then come and debate them.

 

Absolute nonsense.

Again, you're either confusing me with someone else, or you're seeing something that isn't there.

What have I said about GG? I have only said that his resume isn't great. It isn't. I've only said that his era wasn't as strong as the early 90's. It wasn't. I've only questioned people's opinions on why they're certain that he'd have wrecked guys like Roy and Toney etc, despite struggling with Danny Jacobs. Not agreeing with an idiot who debates on emotion rather than logic, does not constitute as hate.

I have never hyped up Frazier. I've hardly discussed Joe since being a member.

I have never said today sucks and that everything was better in the past.

The only thing I've said, is that although boxing has improved since the introduction of the M.O.Q. it doesn't progress each decade, in the way that some other sports have/do.

It's hilarious. Because it's actually guys like you who are the ignorant ones. It's you who believes everything modern is better. It's you who believes that boxing keeps progressing like sprinting and swimming etc.


Run along and get your facts straight next time.

 

Who are you to question anything?

I've already explained why I made the thread.

It was from THREE years ago.

Again, AT THE TIME, many people on here were hyping Wlad and Pulev.

The thread was made in response to those people.

If you don't agree, I really don't give a FK.

 

Along with Todd, you're one of the least knowledgeable posters on this forum.

Nobody wants your attention.

You're completely insignificant.


You are the guy who claims that the current MW division, is more stacked than the MW division of the early 90's.

Ha!

Tragic.

The only reason you believe that, is because you have no knowledge of that era.

You are the nut who wants video evidence of Roy and McCallum beating BJS and Lemiuex, before your pea brain can decipher which ones are/were the best.


Regarding PEDS, why on earth have you typed out the above?

We know that PEDS give you an advantage. Otherwise they wouldn't exist would they.

The issue, is where you've claimed that GG would have beaten Roy, had he have taken what Roy did.


Back up your opinion.

What did Roy take?

What were the PEDS, which would have ensured GG a victory over Roy?


You can't answer, because you've backed yourself into a corner.

It was a bold statement based on NOTHING.

Just like the rest of the horse manure that you regularly post.


GG is very hittable.

He hasn't got a great defence.

Roy had a huge speed advantage.

He had a reach advantage.

He would have found GG without issue.


So what were the PEDS which would have prevented Roy from teeing off on a guy with little head movement?

What are the PEDS which would have made Roy's shots ineffectual?


Come on chief.


If you think GG would have beaten Roy having taken what Roy did, then:

1. Tell me what Roy took.

2. Tell me how it would have happened.


If you're going to type out bold statements, then be prepared to be challenged.

If you don't want to be challenged, then stop pretending that you know what you're talking about.


A few years ago, I'd have probably enjoyed trashing you and Todd. But the truth is, I just pity the pair of you.

 

Aren't you the guy who possesses an unhealthy obsession with bears having sexual interactions with men?

Don't worry about me.

I'm the least of your worries.

 

Same username?

 

Please no.

Not again.

Ha!