Perspective on Wlad, and the HW division

You're hilarious.

So Roy's speed and power were only due to PEDS?

Ha!


Again, he passed 4 random tests AFTER Hall, and he still looked as great as he had before.


Now for the 6th time of asking:

What PEDS are there which would/could have improved GG's technical abilities?

Because unless he could have tightened up his defence, Roy would have tagged him at will.


GG is EASY to hit.


This was Roy at LHW: (he was even quicker at MW)

https://imgur.com/gallery/dkADuyL

 

What sort of argument is that?

What do you mean: "Take away his speed and power"?

Yes, if you'd have taken away his speed and power, then GG would have beaten him.

That makes as much sense as saying: "Take away GG's power and his chin, and then......."

You can't debate using that kind of logic.


Again, PEDS didn't give Roy all of his speed and power.

Again, after Hall, he still possessed the same speed and power.

He easily beat a tough HW in John Ruiz.


PEDS give fighters physical advantages.

They don't give fighters technical advantages.

You could give Amir Khan every PED available. It wouldn't mean that he'd have beaten Tommy Hearns.

Yes, PEDS clearly give advantages. But they can't win fights alone.

If GG had PEDS, they would give him advantages. But he'd still have the same skill set. He'd still have little head movement. He'd still be easy to hit. He wouldn't suddenly turn into Pernell Whittaker. (you won't know who he is, so look him up)

So yes, they give advantages. But they aren't magical. Even with PEDS: GG would still have been as easy to hit, he'd still have had a shorter reach, and he'd still have been significantly slower.

It's no good having power fuelled by PEDS, if you can't land your shots because you're getting tagged.

Even with PEDS, GG would still have needed the OPPORTUNITY to have taken Roy out.

Your entire thought process is completely ignorant.

Roy would easily have hit any version of GG, as evidenced by the fights we've seen him in. So again, unless Roy's shots had been completely ineffective, (how could they have been?) then it's ridiculous to claim with certainty that GG would have beaten him.

You have made a bold statement which you can't back up.

 

You had the opportunity to respond to my comments regarding Joe, GG and Wlad.

As always, you couldn't refute anything I'd said.

You had no comeback to what I'd written.

The only option you were left with, was to respond in the manner that you've shown above.


I used to enjoy trashing you and exposing your lack of intellect. But then I just started to feel guilty.

I still feel the same.

It's like having a drag race between a Smart car and a Lamborghini.

Pointless.


Enjoy your emojis.

It's the only thing you have.

 

No they didn't give him his athleticism you fool.

Was he taking them when he was 13 years old?


For the 4th time: he passed 4 other random tests and STILL possessed the same attributes.

How do you account for that?


Obviously you had no answer for the other points that I made.


Hopefully, you've learnt a lesson:

Don't make bold statements that you can't back up.