Perspective on Wlad, and the HW division

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Loudon, Nov 15, 2014.


  1. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    To be honest with you, I wasn't going to give you any more attention.

    But your emotional rants are so entertaining, I'll gladly oblige you for as long as you want.


    Yes, Roy relied heavily on his athleticism.

    Yes, PEDS give fighters advantages.

    If you'd followed the thread, which you obviously haven't, you'd realise that that's not the issue that I have with Mirkofilipovik.

    No, GG hasn't been dropped like Roy.

    Which means what, Einstein?

    Roy's only clear loss was after he'd fought over 50 fights, across 5 weight classes.

    He got caught by the likes of Tarver, whilst campaigning in his THIRD weight class.

    GG is still at MW. We don't know how he'd fare at SMW, let alone beyond that.

    If you knew anything about Roy, then you'd know that he was extremely hard to hit clean when he was prime.

    Roy losing at LHW at 35, doesn't mean that GG would have beaten him when he was 25 at MW.

    You posting up a video of Glen Johnson was done out of sheer desperation.

    GG is smaller than Roy was at MW, he's easy to hit, and he's scraped by Danny Jacobs.

    If a WW with a 69" reach could tag him with ease, then Roy would have thought it was Christmas.


    Get back to me.

    I'll clown you all day, everyday.
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2017
  2. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Mental gymnastics?


    You have:

    Ignored my points

    Twisted my words

    Made up 5 fictitious quotes.


    You are pathetic.

    You made a bold statement which you couldn't back up, and out of desperation, you had to invent things as a diversion from it.

    You and Todd are the biggest clowns on this entire forum.

    You're both absolutely hopeless.

    You told me just a week ago that this current MW division was more stacked than the early 90's, and we'd need to see video evidence before we could decipher who the best fighters were.

    Ha!

    You're a complete laughing stock.
     
  3. mirkofilipovic

    mirkofilipovic ESB Management Full Member

    28,390
    39,782
    Jan 7, 2014
    You are the most hated poster on these boards, you admit PED’s are enhancing, yet refuse to see how Roys Athleticism benefited from steroids. If you CANT see this, I cant help you.
     
    Kevin Willis likes this.
  4. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    The most hated poster on this board?

    Ha!


    You are all over the place.

    You are trying to claim that PEDS gave Roy his attributes, and without them he couldn't have done anything. Then when I inform you that he passed random tests afterwards, you say it was only because they were still in his system.

    There's footage of Roy when he was in his teens, throwing lightening shots. So I guess that Roy Snr must have been pumping him full of PEDS way back in the 80's on his farm.


    You still haven't told me how GG would have beaten Roy with the same PEDS.

    You still haven't told me why there's no fighter today who can do this:

    https://imgur.com/gallery/dkADuyL


    Keep the posts flowing though.

    It's great comedy.
     
  5. mirkofilipovic

    mirkofilipovic ESB Management Full Member

    28,390
    39,782
    Jan 7, 2014
    So PED’s dont affect athleticism then? Roy ingested steroids but it didnt MAKE his athleticism. Okay genius, keep up the stupidity.
     
    Kevin Willis likes this.
  6. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    We've only ever seen Tyson Fury fight one truly top tier guy and he won a clear decision against him. See where I'm going with this?
     
  7. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    why are not explaining how PEDs make you more skilled a boxer?

    get a move on, this century preferably.
     
  8. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,341
    Feb 4, 2012
    Yeah Fury is pretty good. I'm not saying he isn't. The evidence although limited is in his favor. In Pulev's case however...
     
  9. mirkofilipovic

    mirkofilipovic ESB Management Full Member

    28,390
    39,782
    Jan 7, 2014
    Your skills are amplified by PED’s. I never said PED’s give you skills.
     
  10. Todd498

    Todd498 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,817
    19,075
    Jun 13, 2011
    You’re beyond stupid and you’ve proven that you are over and over again :D You’ve said on many occasions that you can’t say Roy loses to such and such fighter just because he lost to a particular fighter. Yet you think it’s okay to bust out with the Kell Brook fight as a gage on how EASILY Roy would have hit GGG.

    “Roy would have thought it was Christmas” :facepalm::facepalm: Lol Do really think you’re clever with this STUPID **** you come back with?? :D You’ve contradicted yourself and have been exposed as hypocrite countless times on here.

    Yeah that Glen Johnson video hurt your feelings huh? :D Good. It was meant to drive home the fact that GGG has NEVER been cursed with a sorry ass mandible like your hero was exposed to have. Lol!


    “I wasn’t going to even give you more attention but...” :risas3: How many times are you going to say that to people and then reply to them with long ass butt hurt 15 separate sentence LOUDon ‘rebuttals’?? Lol! All day every day is right my bitter little troll try hard :) I will be on you like a fly on **** until doomsday. You’re a lot of fun to **** off and watch spaz the **** out! Lol!

    “Roy losing at 35 doesn’t mean GGG would have beaten him.” Lol! Hahahaha! Then you point out GGG getting hit a few times at 34 trying to say “ROY WOULD HAVE THOUGHT CHRISTMAS CAME EARLY HITTING GGG ALL DAY!” :wanker But we shouldn’t use other fighters or fights as examples huh stupid?? Just you! Lol Wow...

    Oh I almost forgot! Here are some more emojis for you Mr “Steroids didn’t give Roy ANY extra speed or explosiveness.”

    :b1::banana::dancer2::clapclap::banana::b1:


    Loudon———>:eek::pipi:boxing1:bash:

    Looking forward to your reply my attention seeking little cum dump :) :chuck:
     
  11. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    to clarify, does amplified skills mean BETTER skills or WORSE skills? or do the skills stay the same?

    YOU HAVE TO CHOOSE ONE, since you are making the claim of a change in ability here.
     
  12. mirkofilipovic

    mirkofilipovic ESB Management Full Member

    28,390
    39,782
    Jan 7, 2014
    It means being able to use those skills more proficiently.
     
  13. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    so, presumably if a crap plumber took enough PEDs, he's become a proficient one. In Mirks view of life, that is.

    NO, PEDs wouldnt give him skills to appear more proficient at all.

    Try again.
     
  14. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    how do you become more proficient?

    you develop skills in your profession.
     
  15. mirkofilipovic

    mirkofilipovic ESB Management Full Member

    28,390
    39,782
    Jan 7, 2014
    If you have SKILLS but lack athleticism, those skills you wont be able to utilize properly. Common sense. Why overthink it?
     
    Rock0052 likes this.