Peter was robbed

Your own score is 6-4 and you're talking about a robbery?

A robbery is 8-2 or 9-1. 6-4 is losing a questionable decision, not a robbery.

 

Chambers
Agreed. I had it 7-3 Chambers 97-93 and easily could have been 98-92 IMO

 

Judging by the responses you got It's safe to say your 1 of the few people who saw the fight this way.

 

:rofl:rofl

 

I totally agree on both

 

atsch

 

ahah Peter was robbed...ahahah
Funny guy. Close (and boring) fight. WHen its close, its no robbery.
Anyway. Both guys are not serious enough. We know who was the bigger but i don't know who was the fattest.

 

atschatschatsch:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

Fool:hi:

 

I love boxing but this fight was typical these days. Two out of shape guys who don't seem all that motivated. They pick up the check and skip to the next ridiculous promotion.

As bad as the fight was, the undercard was worse. Three mismatches that didn't get out of the first round. The winners should have been embarrassed. Too bad Teddy didn't speak out about this.

 

That's what I had, and I think an MD is ******ed for this fight. Chambers was the clear winner.

 

So a two point difference (you're close to scoring the fight a draw) is a robbery??? :huh

I always thought you were as thick as pig****, and I was right. :good

 

Only if you gave rounds to Peter because Chambers was inactive. IMO he landed the better punches. Atlas kept saying "Peter was winning rounds because Chambers was not active enough". A fighter needs to wins rounds themself, not because the other guy is losing them. While Chambers wasnt very active, Peter didnt take advantage of it IMO

Peter wasnt very active either. IMO when chambers was active, he did enough to win the rounds

 

hhahaahahaha... :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

:good:good
I was SHOCKED at that... totally classless move by Atlas... it was even worse then OTG with shannon on air Just ****ing with you:yep

Chambers should have fired back at Atlas... instead it was "yes sir" **** Atlas.