Peterson's doctor's note

The fact that this note is from one of those "Wellness Clinics" makes it even worse. Those places would give a perfectly healthy male w/ normal test levels, hgh and synth test because the patient says, "I feel a little sluggish".

 

great comparison

 

I hope people read all of the letter, doctor brings up a point that he treated Peterson last in November 2011 for this medical issue.

i think they might have a point tbf.

 

Why the F8ck was Lamont at an oasis clinic in Las vegas November 2011?

CHEAT.

Where is Lamont's residence? DC right?

Decides to go to a place for a medical issue where you can get married in a drive through...

 

peterson's got a better build. . don't know if homo.

 

IMO he shoulda submitted this from the beggining...He is a fighter and he knows...If he does not know, it is his MANAGER'S or PROMOTER'S and/or BOTH to know...submit the damn letter before hand along with the test results, proving that his testosterone was low.

Up to Khan now....I would have the doctor testify to this info, as well as provide more evdience of the samples...

 

What? That he used it against Khan in the first match? Yeah, I agree, let this fight PLEASE go forward, and change the first fight to a NC like it should have been anyway due to the referee, and judges. . .


Let khan whip his ass, and make him pay for his transgressions.


Also, it simply says he was "treated last" in November 2011, meaning he got his last 'script at that time. . . How long does a 'script last, is the question. . But I am on the boat that he DID NOT juice for the rematch, and simply had some leftover in his system.

 

yea right...Bradley looks like he swallows rocks for dinner.

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK6TXMsvgQg[/ame]



Peterson earned this Benny Hill music. How dumb do you have to be to do this to yourself?

 

The longer, leaner muscular look is better than the short, squat, and stumpy muscled look. Peterson just as ripped, but looks a lot more proportional, and more natural. . Oh wait, I guess he wasn't natural. . . .

 

His total testosterone level is totally fine. In patients with real hypogonadism, that value is significantly lower. The only symptoms stated are self reported - difficult concentrating, and fatigue. Patients with real hypogonadism would have a lot more clinical signs. Disruption of glucose, lipid and cholesterol metabolism, low bone mass, low hematocrit, MCV etc.

The bit where the doctor said that in his opinion free testosterone was more "important" is bs. The only difference between bound and unbound testosterone is bound is attached to a carrier protein. His free testosterone level is low, but a single value isn't serious enough for him to warrant taking PEDs without consulting or advising the boxing authorities. IF most of us on this forum were tested for free testosterone levels, a large number of us may find low values, and yet have no complaints or symptoms.

Also the second follow up he had in April, when was it? We know at some point the pellets were removed. If it was later on in the month, it would account for why the testosterone levels were lower.

So in summary. Doesn't tell us anything we didn't already suspect.

 

You are again talking out of your arse. It is already up because you injected it!!!!!

Hormone production is governed in a 3 axis,feedback governed method.

It simply means that the pituitary is the governing organ, which influence the secreting organ or production organ and finally the effector or the organ affected.

If you inject testosterone, it would not be the testosterone that would get low but the hormone that allows testosterone to be produced or the the FSH and the LH, via the feedback mechanism.

To make your stupid mind understand, once you introduced an exogenous source of Androgen (testosterone) the body would tell the pituitary to stop producing FSH and LH to stop the natural production of Testosterone.

The thing is that the TESTOSTERONE level actually went up in Peterson's test, which if you consider what the letter is saying, should not actually happen because it was a therapeutic dosage, and even so, despite that', after several months of the SLOW-RELEASE INJECTION, his free Testosterone never really increased, but went down furher.

 

I was about to say.. This letter is dodgy as f*ck. it can be picked apart. somebody needs to analyse them numbers. why is he mentioning october 2011? I thought he was first contacted by Lamont in November 2011?

 

What are you on about? I have not stated the fight should ahead, I'm clearly pointing that if he only got treated in november, why didn't it show up in the tests they had after the fight in december? why in April, just makes no sense.

Had they wanted to look clean, the camp would've said they got treated for this in 2012

 

Haha. I wonder what they paid this doc for the letter