PeteThePrince's Top 50 P4P Greatest Fighters Ever - ROUGH DRAFT!!

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by PetethePrince, Feb 16, 2010.


  1. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Pretty much. I moved Chavez up a tad, but I still contemplate how much he should be moved up. He's a tough one for to judge.
     
  2. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Do you think he'd have trouble dealing with the skillful boxers among the top 50?
     
  3. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    I like your placing of Michael Spinks. Would have been a nightmare for anyone to beat, pretty damn complete. Good handspeed, good chin, power in both hands, and never lacked stamina or toughness. On an even playing field (unlike the Tyson and Holmes fights), It'd be tough to bet against the man.
     
  4. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,088
    10,495
    Jul 28, 2009
    Yeah, it's looking much better to me. I might consider moving Holmes up though because he was so complete and had underrated power, great speed, chin, etc. H2H at HW it seems like Holmes is thought of as being on very close terms to Ali when people discuss fantasy match-ups.

    You do know how they say many a truth is often said in jest...
     
  5. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Despite being given hell by Norton and Shavers.


    :lol: I do think Barrera was a complete fighter at his best, but there's more than 50 better fighters in history than him. The losses to Jones and Pacquiao make it hard to argue for him here.
     
  6. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    A little bit considering what a past prime Whitaker could do. But I definitely think he could be up a bit more... it's just a question of where.

    Comparing him to Basilio is interesting. Basilio was a great welterweight but beat SRR at middleweight while having a 10 lb disadvantage. Robinson was past his prime but still Ray Robinson. Basilio had stamina, chin, toughness... all like Chavez. P4P I think Chavez was more brutal a puncher, but I think Basilio had better inside-skills.


    Thanks yeah. Oh yeah, Michael Spinks was a beast at light-heavyweight. I think he had the style to deal with many different fighters. He was awkward too, and one of the few light-heavyweights to win the HW championship. Beating an old Cooney and Holmes is still impressive enough for me considering the rest of what he did. Spinks is the best name on Tyson's resume. And some forget how great of a fighter he was.


    The Shavers giving him hell is an exaggeration. It was a white-wash one-sided affair. Holmes got caught big time but got up, ran around the ring via Tunney vs Dempsey II and went on to win. It says a lot about his recovery. At the same time, an ancient Ali wasn't even dropped by Shavers... A better Shavers too!

    I considering Barrera for about 15 seconds. Just couldn't do it, but knew you would love it. :lol:

    I considered it, still do. I don't subscribe to Holmes being as good as Ali H2H. Ali was faster with his hands and feet. Had stronger legs, a better chin, better staminaand I figure he was smarter. I think Ali had the intangibles and a better ability to find a way to overcome. Holmes, though, had a better left jab and a bit more power, and is better technically. A great fighter... I feel Holmes almost played down to his competition a bit. Ali dominated better for me with better winning opposition too. I have confidence Ali is capable of beating every Heavyweight on his best night. Holmes... not so much.

    People forget about his stamina. He threw tons of punches in his 60's fights. People talk about his legs or lack of hand-speed when he came back. But he also didn't punch with his as much activity. Chuvalo talks about this, too.
     
  7. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    I know Angelo Dundee, who was involved with Basillo, once said Chavez was the toughest fighter he'd ever seen. That might count for nothing, but I think Chavez had more technique than Basillo in addition to his toughness.
     
  8. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Dundee says a lot of things man. Hear what he said about Cotto recently and why he thought he would beat Pac?

    What about him thinking Douglas would beat Tyson AFTER the fact? :lol:

    I love Angelo, but the guy tries to shine in the spotlight a little bit.

    Better punching technique? Perhaps. But do you think he was a better inside fighter? I don't. Chavez will be moved. It's probably just where...
     
  9. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    I think Chavez was the better composite puncher, probably was better defensively, and was comparable to Basillo in terms of punch resistance and toughness at his peak. I'm probably biased because I tend to find Chavez more aesthetically pleasing and that sways my judgment. We're nitpicking, perhaps?
     
  10. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Yes and no.

    Chavez is the better, harder puncher. I think Basilio gave your more composite punching over a 15 round time. Basilio was one of the best trained fighters. Out-working SRR while giving away 10 pounds at MW impresses the **** out of me. Chavez matches punch-resistance and toughness. While I admit Chavez was more brutal a puncher, I am not so sure he's better skilled on the inside, nor am I sure he's better defensively. If anything, maybe his punch-resistance was slightly better, but his defense was worse.

    Where would you place Chavez?
     
  11. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,088
    10,495
    Jul 28, 2009
    I don't know about "despite". Neither of those guys made Ali look like the GOAT either. Norton is one of those guys whose style is so unorthodox that he can give one guy who's not that good no unusual trouble, then make a more textbook talented guy who is great seem kind of average. Hard to predict how his style is going to effect a fighter. And I believe Holmes went in injured. Can't remember, torn bicep or something like that. Holmes still won though. And as far as Shavers, I think if he catches you flush and start to damage you, he can give you hell as long as you can take it. No shame there.
     
  12. keith

    keith ESB OG Full Member

    3,627
    3
    Sep 5, 2004


    If yours is based uniquely on ability, then how is Jones at 16 too high?

    Keith
     
  13. keith

    keith ESB OG Full Member

    3,627
    3
    Sep 5, 2004

    I have Chavez in the top 10. 90+ straight wins is nearly impossible, no matter who you are fighting.

    Keith
     
  14. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,465
    Sep 7, 2008
    I've gotta say, I like petetheprince, but not his list.
     
  15. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007

    Pete would lose two vowel's in his name if he moved Marciano down any further.

    I agree an all of your too high picks. In addition, Holyfield is too high, and Tyson who lost all of his legacy fight should not crack the top 50.