PeteThePrince's Top 50 P4P Greatest Fighters Ever - ROUGH DRAFT!!

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by PetethePrince, Feb 16, 2010.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,064
    Mar 21, 2007

    I didn't mean that you should include Jeffries on your list.
     
  2. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    So you're saying contemporary thoughts don't mean much?

    *Edit*

    Pep bumped up.

    Dempsey over Marciano... that is the question... :think
     
  3. Cmoyle

    Cmoyle Active Member Full Member

    1,284
    14
    Nov 6, 2006
    No Sam Langford? He belongs way up there on this list.
     
  4. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    1920's onward.
     
  5. Abdullah

    Abdullah Boxing Junkie banned

    8,257
    13
    Dec 2, 2008
    Not a bad list. I disagree with you in some areas, but that's to be expected. It's nice to see the right guy at #1 and also to see Greg so high. A lot of people sleep on Greb.
     
  6. Abdullah

    Abdullah Boxing Junkie banned

    8,257
    13
    Dec 2, 2008
    Why? Didn't you say greatest fighters EVER?
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,064
    Mar 21, 2007

    I think they are crucial for fighters of whom there is very limited film, less so in Dempsey's case. But my overall point was that contemporary opinion on Dempsey seems less forceful than contemporary opinion was on Jeffries and Sullivan too, actually. I do think that his standing was enhanced right after his retirment. His popularity took a huge boost, too.
     
  8. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Sam Langford fought in over 50 matches in the 1920's. His resume in the 1920's includes a KO win over hall of fame heavyweight George Godfrey, a Win over Hall of fame heavyweight Sam MCvey, and a win over Jeff Clarke, who should be in the hall of fame.
     
  9. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Because my knowledge is a bit scattered that farther back you go. And boxing changed a bit. It really has more to do with the former than latter, although my criteria here is more about ability/skill rather than proven greatness through a resume and longevity.
     
  10. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Contemporary thought was quite good after the Williard bout I think. I don't see your post, since we're talking about fighters who career spanned 1920's and onward. So you're just circling around about nothing, really.
     
  11. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    He was 37, and well past his prime. If anything, it would be Willis who is more deserving of a mention as being Dempsey's #1 contender and constantly re-enforcing his worth while Dempsey wasn't fighting.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,064
    Mar 21, 2007

    I think you're getting defensive/confused about your list. I'm not talking about your list. I'm talking about boxing in your thread about your list in that post. I'm not circling (circling what?) about nothing (rather something specific).
     
  13. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    I know you don't like Sugar and Fleisher. And Jim Jeffries was raved about during his time. So...?

    You can't just make a comment like that and just try to leave it as that.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,064
    Mar 21, 2007