**Please explain to me your logic as of why Clottey won last night**

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Orishaman, Jun 14, 2009.


  1. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    Here[s your chance to proof to me that Clottey got robbed...come ..I am listening!!!
     
  2. fenian 67

    fenian 67 Active Member Full Member

    1,388
    0
    Mar 19, 2009
    :-i believe you can expect cotto bodyslammed him,cotto hit him low,cotto hit him in the back of the head.:-( i had it 115-113 cotto
     
  3. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    Perhaps retaliation after a nasty hedbutt.......I had it 115-112 Cotto..but wanted to give a chance to the haters to post thier theories
     
  4. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,462
    1,725
    Nov 20, 2007
    114-113 Clottey.
     
  5. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    why? expalin..cause I can;t see it...and neither two other judges
     
  6. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005

    Why do you have to be a hater to think Cotto lost? It was a close fight can't you just be one of the many people (including 1 judge) that scored it for Clottey?
     
  7. Jan(DK)

    Jan(DK) Joined april 2007 Full Member

    3,454
    0
    Jun 29, 2008
    Sure you do :patsch
     
  8. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    "I picked Clottey and I don't like being wrong."
     
  9. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
     
  10. bigeddie27

    bigeddie27 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,179
    1
    Apr 7, 2007
    he outlanded cotto by about 60-70 punches laned. In a fight where that accounted for about 40% of the totals. But lets look beside that totally wide margin of a number for one second. Lets look at the shots cotto didnt land. Lets look at cotto running scared like a little girl for the last 5 rounds (just like he did against mosley, AND YOU GUYS ARE FANS OF THIS ****?). Lets also look at the 116 - 111. Clottey would have lost no matter what. no matter what.

    but i might be mad that my boy lost. Or mad i lost $200.00. You wanna know what im not mad about? Taking the bet on those odds. You will NEVER ****ING SEE JOSHUA A +260 UNDERDOG EVER AGAIN. And I am glad he is getting the respect he deserves on this board finally. And he WILL be back.
     
  11. Batman Da Playa

    Batman Da Playa New Member Full Member

    4
    0
    May 3, 2009
    clottey landed more punches and more percentage, clottey was never really hit except once in the first round and that one time in the back of the head, close fight, but common sense tells you who won, clottey got robbed, 116-111 wtf?
     
  12. Shattered Glass

    Shattered Glass Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,048
    0
    May 30, 2009
    That hit behind the head was not intentional from Cotto. They were in a clinch, Cotto kind of spun round and just unloaded. Clottey should have been facing at all times.

    The throw down was blown out of proportion as well. Clottey went down like Ronaldo in the penalty area.
     
  13. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
     
  14. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    Dude..you guys were watching another fight last night.....this is funny....Cotto was not running , he was outboixing Clottye who was not effective to handle Cottos sticking and moving in the Champioship rounds...

    Sorry guys but chasing a guy is not EFFECTIVE AGRESSIVENESS.....he was just chasing with no plans....at all....he got drop...and took advantage of Cotto inability to see the right hand...I did say that Clottey fought bravely, but winning ..he came a little short
     
  15. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004