Please Participate--All Time Lightweight Survey (POLL CLOSED!!)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Oct 29, 2009.


  1. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    blackburn ,nelson ,mclarnin, berg .cant find room for all maybe not even one this is the hardest weight so far, i have made about 4 list's so far
     
  2. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,253
    Feb 6, 2009
    who is No1 ?
     
  3. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009

    for me duran but only just over leonard but again not 100% sure i like what i have read about leonard will look at some arcel quotes as he saw both ,trained both leonard was on his comeback then but arcel new him in and out of the gym when he was in his prime
     
  4. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,772
    8,306
    Feb 11, 2005
    1. Duran
    2. Leonard
    3. Whitaker
    4. Gans
    5. Williams
    6. Armstrong
    7. Ortiz
    8. Tony Canzoneri
    9. Barney Ross
    10. Joe Brown
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,769
    29,161
    Jun 2, 2006
    I have Buchanan at eleven ,I agonised about leaving him out ,but in the end opted for Joe Brown .
     
  6. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    I'm not drinking the McAuliffe Kool-Aid.

    1. Benny Leonard
    2. Roberto Duran
    3. Joe Gans
    4. Carlos Ortiz
    5. Pernell Whitaker
    6. Ike Williams
    7. Henry Armstrong
    8. Barney Ross
    9. Tony Canzoneri
    10. Packy McFarland
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,769
    29,161
    Jun 2, 2006
    Rematching men so many times indicates a dearth of quality competition to me.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,769
    29,161
    Jun 2, 2006
    Your analogy between McAuliffe and the Black dynamite trio is easily refuted,simply because Langford ,Mcvey ,Jeanette, and, later Wills fought each other so often because the top champions and contenders would not fight them , because the colour of their skin meant they could be safely bypassed. and when they occasionally did they often insisted on a handcuff arrangement.
    McAuliffe fought 5 guys a total of eleven times.Why ?

    Ask yourself why he NEVER rematched Griffo or Carney ,who both held him to draws?
    You make a nonsensical statement like" I know nothing of Billy Dacey , but I am sure he was not a novice".:huh


    MAuliffe really didn't dominate his era did he? He was held to a draw in three fights one by a featherweight who was an alcoholic , another was in front at the premature end,and he had a draw with Billy Myer,and when he beat him both men were over 137lbs, so it was not a lightweight defence, as the limit was 133lbs .
    If he had rematched Carney and Griffo and beaten them I would give him more slack ,but he didnt.
    The Carney fight saw Carney coming in at 129lbs McAuliffe at 126lbs.
    It was a prvate fight ,with both men being allowed to invite 14 guests ,who had to be vetted.
    Carney scored a knockdown in the 7th round but rallied strongly.As the 60th round came up Mcauliffe was seriously weary,[no wonder] ,his backers attempted to stop the affair but were subdued .In the 70th rd Carney again dropped
    McAuliffe,and again McAuliffes friends interfered with the proceedings and gained him an extended rest. In the 74th round Carney again put McAuliffe down ,and at this McAuliffe's backers rushed the ring once more, the referee, a Mr Stevenson declared the contest a draw,because of fears of a police intervention, at the time of the stoppage Carney was clearly in front whereas McAuliffe looked all in.
    Carney and McAulife reenacted their fight 27 years later in London[1914],it was refereed by the former British heavyweight Champion Charley Mitchell,and photos of it can be seen in Nat Fleischer's " A Pictorial History Of Boxing"Along with an account of the fight , and a picture of McAuliffe in old age [65] posing with the gloves he wore for the fight,they are open ended with a separate thumbpiece that is also open ended.

    It seems you rate fighters different to me ,thats for sure.C:\Documents and Settings\OEM\My Documents\My Pictures\McAuliffe and Carney


    C:\Documents and Settings\OEM\My Documents\My Pictures\McAuliffe and Carney



    C:\Documents and Settings\OEM\My Documents\My Pictures\McAuliffe and Carney


    Tried to show the photos ,looks like I failed.:oops:
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,769
    29,161
    Jun 2, 2006
    I think Mclarnin belongs in the welterweight tournament myself.
     
  10. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009

    yeah i know what your saying but he and berg were avoided at lightweight and mclarnin i am sure i have read somewhere was a better lightweight than welter but did not get a shot i will could be wrong as i think i read this in baby face goes to hollywood

    forgot mclarnin lost to mandell
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,769
    29,161
    Jun 2, 2006
    Carney and Mcauliffe re enacted their fight 27 years later.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,074
    48,252
    Mar 21, 2007
    I agree. I think he was better at that weight, too.
     
  13. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    :lol:
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,769
    29,161
    Jun 2, 2006
    Mac I took a couple of pic from Fleischers book, to show you Carney and McAuliffe , unfortunately I can't get them up .sorry!
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,074
    48,252
    Mar 21, 2007

    Pisser! Well cheers for the thought anyway.