odds are wilder will taste the canvas vs stiverne. who btw, has almost as thin a resume as wilder. probably on par with fury.
Stiverne is nothing but a paper champ. He's a hypejob like Wilder. Padded records with cans. Cherrypicking and hyping. Lets see the winner of this fight against Wlad or Povetkin.:yep:deal
Not sure what planet you are on, neither Wilder or Stiverne are hyped in any way. 95% of posts on Wilder in this forum are ridiculing him (deservedly so). I haven't seen anyone proclaim Stiverne as anything other than a half decent heavyweight.
:shock::shock: Please go re/watch against what kind of opponents where these 2 guys matched.:deal Compared with these 2 hypes, Fury looks like rugged HW warrior.:yep
we all know that they try to resurrect the black HW division in U.S with the help of cherrypicking and hyping techniques.:yep Still I want to see the winner of this fight against Wlad or Povetkin.:yep
Well, the opportunity was there but he chose instead to carry that false WBA title for 3 yrs while putting off a Wlad fight. Now, at 35, he's got 2-3 yrs to make another run, and several top fighters have gotten much better in the WBC rankings. Yes, Potvetkin<Stiverne. And yes, he woulda beaten both Arreola and Stiverne en route to winning the WBC title. But instead, he chose the toughest route, ie fighting Wlad and getting bullied for 12 ugly rds. :-(
Have you even read my post properly? Saying it again for a special needs poster like you - just about every poster on this board think that Wilder is utter sh!t, which he is, and i haven't seen anyone proclaim Steverne as a great heavyweight either. Neither of the boxers are hyped, because almost no one thinks that they are any good.