Poll: Mayweather vs Golovkin @ 155 lbs

Come on now, are you seriously trying to compare Mike Tyson to Golovkin in terms of record?. You do realize that Golovkin's biggest win to date is a blown up Welterweight, right?. I hope you also do realize that Mike Tyson remains to this very day the youngest Heavyweight champion in history. Name one serious achievement Golovkin accomplished.

 

Go watch highlights of Golovkin devouring bums he exploded in the arena against as a 1/100 favorite. It should help cheer you up.

 

i'm fine. you are a racist clown. dems da facts.

 

He defeated the number one pfp boxer who is also the face of boxing and fighter of the Year and got robbed.He tied the all time middleweight title defense record at 20 with 18 by ko,he had a KO .streak of 23 straight.He unified 3 of the middleweight belts.He had the face of boxing Canelo vacate his belt rather than fight him and delay the fight for 1.5 years tell he felt he was ready.Also you keep saying his best win is vs a welterweight when Jacobs is a better middleweight than Brook is at welterweight and Golovkin defeated him.

 

No he did not beat the number one P4P boxer who is the face of Boxing. He had a draw and justifiably so since both fighters looked terrible in the first showing. Then he moved on to lose against number one P4P Boxer in the rematch. The number one P4P boxer stood in his face and exchanged blows with him with zero signs of the murderous punching power he was hyped to have making any impact whatsoever.

All the rest of his fights were carefully selected fights to make him look better and carry on the social media hype train. Even though the hype train was going in full force, no one wanted to back it up by actually paying to watch him. That's exactly why he only headlined one event on PPV which was solely based on him as the primary seller and it flopped miserably.

Brook went to America to beat an the undefeated Champion Shawn Porter in an extremely tough fight. Jacobs has zero wins that compare to that.

 

If boxing was a fair sport today GGG would still be the Undefeated World Middleweight Boxing Champion

 

First off everybody knows who won the first fight,that's not even a debate,i said GGG was robbed.As for Brook,the Porter fight was a great win,but that was many years ago.Jacobs is getting better an Kell Brook is getting worse.Canelo taking GGG's punches just proves that Canelo is special and has granite chin ,will, and defensive skills.Holyfield wasn't moved by Tysons vaunted power in two fights, does that make Tysons power irrelevant or overrated? Hell NO! It just means Tyson met his match, credit to Holyfield.Also Tyson's run of victims weren't exactly world beaters themselves during his title reign, good fighters yes,but GGG faced simular.With Tyson you had Berbick,Bonecrusher Smith,Thomas,Tony Tucker,Biggs, Holmes,Tubbs, Spinks,Bruno,Carl Williams,before getting beat up and stopped by Buster Douglas.Golovkin had Ouma,Proksa,Rosado,Macklin, Stevens,Geale,Rubio,Murray, Monroe, Lemieux,Wade who knocked down and defeated Porter in the amatures and Kell Brook.Knocked them all out in devastating fashion Then took on Jacobs Before getting robbed in at least the first Canelo fight,add to that the Martirosyan and Derevyanchenko wins Most of them were ring top 10 fighters.

 

If boxing was a fair sport deverenko would have beaten ggg, and Jacobs should've at least had a draw and of course the Canelo loss would still be there.

 

The Brook vs Porter fight was only 2 years before Brook fought Golovkin. That fight was the primary reason behind Golovkin's interest in fighting him anyway. Yes indeed it proves Alvarez is special and has a granite chin, but it also proves that Golovkin is not a murderous puncher as he was hyped to be. He hasn't KO'd a single A class fighter his entire career. No, Golovkin did NOT fight similar opposition as Tyson. That is beyond ridiculous to even compare. There's a reason Golovkin is hardly relevant nowadays while Tyson remained relevant his entire career. Tyson had PROVEN murderous punching power, speed in both hands and a granite chin. He also had severely underrated head movement early in his career. Golovkin is nothing but a one-dimensional plodder with mediocre speed, unproven power and a solid chin(thanks to one fight against Alvarez for proving that). Even the most diehard Golovkin fans I've spoken to don't even dare to make the comical comparison you're trying to make here. It will only take 1 or 2 years maximum for people to completely forget Golovkin because he hasn't left a single memorable fight worth going back to. Tyson, an ATG, has endless memorable fights worth revisiting forever.

 

Absolute Bull Feces !!

 

Golovkin didn't look to fight Brook,Eubanks dad backed him out so Brook stepped in.As for Tyson,he came on to the scene when the heavyweight division was very week.He then destroyed a bunch of bums, Then destroyed a bunch of bum champions to unify,Then defended against a bunch of bums,old former champs and drug user contenders,Then got his ass handed to him by a bum Douglas,got KO.ED.After that he beat the formidable Razor Ruddock twice,Then went to jail.After he got out,he fought two more bums,Then two more bum champs.Finally Mr KO king fights another a future hall of famer,Holyfield ,destroys him twice mentally and physically.Tyson rebounds and continues to fight bums. Then fights another future Hall of famer "Lewis ' of coarse gets destroyed mentally and physically again against the elite.Then Tyson continues to fight bums tell he can no longer beat them.You see, it's all in how you word it.GGG was never beat down by a bum especially in his prime and gave more than what he got against the younger prime future Hall of famer that he fought, Canelo.I also think Jacobs may eventually make it in as well.I am speaking like a Tyson hater,i am not, just giving a GGG hater a taste of his own medicine.GGG will be remembered,he is also still very relevant, to the tune of $100 million contract with DAZN and filling Venues wherever he fights.So enjoy your Tyson vs bum highlight reels.Just stay clear of Douglas,Holyfield and Lewis.

 

If Golovkin didn't accept the fight, it wouldn't have happened. Simple as that. Instead, he gladly accepted to pack his bags and carry his paper titles all the way to England to score his biggest fight/payday to date. As long as his opponent is hopeless, Golovkin is more than ready to take the flight. The fact that you're comparing a proven ATG, youngest Heavyweight Champion in history, undisputed Heavyweight Champion and internationally renowned fighter like Mike Tyson to a farce that is hardly even mentioned nowadays like Golovkin says more than enough about your knowledge of this sport. True great fighters moved up in weight to make their marks when they had zero competition worth mentioning. Instead, the farce you are hyping up in the most ludicrous way possible, preferred to beg smaller opponents like Brook and Alvarez for paydays. Why wouldn't he when he has fans like you roaring him on?. If there's one fighter that is cornering the market when it comes to bum devouring highlights, it's Golovkin.

 

GGG has landed more jabs than Floyd did during his career and his constant jab would be a problem because of his reach and power, Floyd would have to get inside that jab and that`s very dangerous against a fighter stronger than anybody you`ve ever fought.