POLL: Terence Allan Crawford's Best Win...???

Tough between Micro Man and Ukrainian daddy, but ultimately went with Ukrainian daddy.

 

He put Ramirez "Daddy " but didn't put Pacquiaos "Daddy " in the option, I was just clearing that out.

 

Yeah, coz one of them was the benefactor of a robbery, the other was a victim. It just so happens that you lust over Hispanic fighters and hate Manny Pacquiao.

 

I forgot close fights are all "robberies " for you guy's.

 

Don't lump me in with them, I don't think they were robberies. I didn't say I did either, you wanted a reason why he didn't put 'Pacquiao's daddy', and I gave you one.

You can say that 'us guys' call all close fights robberies but it goes both ways. You can't look past an official decison, and no matter what transpired, can't see fault with what your favourites do. Yet **** on the likes of GGG and Pac for no reason.

 

I don't, it's just false and I can't friggin stand that.

 

Yes I mess with GGG and Pac same way you mess with Canelo and other fighter's, no need to get butthurt to each his own...

 

I speak nothing but truth on Canelo. If he didn't break every rule in the book, I'd probably like him a lot.

 

I forgot "ALL" fights are all "robberies " for you guy's.
You misspelled the word all. I fixed it for ya.

 

It's a pretty sad to list to choose from. Khan and Brook are shot fighters way past their primes and Postol probably wasn't as good as some people thought when he was champ.

I guess Postol would be my reply which really puts into perspective how weak Crawford's resume is. He's already 33 years old and unless he starts immediately fighting the PBC WW's, I just don't see how he can be viewed as the best fighter P4P. I think that title should go to Alvarez.

 

This is not a spelling bee contest, it's a boxing forum, but thanks

 

It was a joke. You wrote "close" and I wrote "all" like in they think "ALL" flights are robberies. Kind of like Manny is undefeated in slow motion or the guy cheated. Ok it was a dad joke sorry.

 

I also speak nothing but the truth about Pacquiao they on the Same boat so why you love Pacquiao and hate Canelo?? Pacquiao fought a bunch of catch weight fights was the catch weight king for a long time fought a bunch of old fighter's who were already shot or past prime drained every fighter he could and got them on the perfect moment robbed Marquez 3 times, isn't that what you accused Canelo of doing????

 

First of all, I don't love Pac, I do like him but he isn't one of my favourites.

You said Barrera was 'ancient' when Pacqiuao beat him. That's either a lie. So no, you don't speak the truth on Pacqiuao.

Pacqiuao has fought three catchweight fights. One of them was vs Marquez, and it was Pacqiuao who needed to move down. The other two were vs natural light middleweights and they weren't drained on the night. Given that Pacquiao was outweighed by upwards of 10lbs vs both Cotto and Margarito, there's no reason to say that the catchweights weren't necessary. Pac is a former FLYWEIGHT FFS! Pacquiao didn't duck the old fighters he fought until they were old. And I thought close fights weren't robberies?

And Pacquiao has never stacked wraps or been caught doing PEDs....