POLL: Wladimir Klitschko's resume....

This is hilarious. Widdow digs this old piece of **** up, thinking that its going to score him some points, and most of the posters here are still tearing him a new *******.

BTW, kudos to Wlad for adding Hasim Rahman to his resume since the construction of this pathedic excuse for a thread. :good

 

Quality

 

Polls mean nothing anyway, according to 'someone' :yep

 

Yep, usual avoidance tactics I see. Predictable as ever.

 

This content is protected

 

Is that the same Hasim Rahman that everyone was saying forced Vitali to fake 5 injuries and run into retirement??? :rofl:rofl:rofl But oh wait a minute, agenda has changed so now he's a bum :yep

 

I think the answer to this poll lies somewhere in the grey area. If we could have 3 options, Yes, No, A Bit...

 

Old is a relative term.

Do you think Calvin Brock was old at 31 when he faced Wlad? He was 29-0 when he faced Wlad. It's not like he had a lot of battles.

Do you think Ray Austin was old at 37? He was 24-3.

Are we talking ring life or just age?

 

You're right, of course. But despite Auston's inexperience (not necessarily itself a credit on Wlad's ledger), 37 is old for a fighter. Period. He could have had 10 fights and its difficult still, to not chalk him down as 'old'. Brock at 29-0 is clearly NOT in that category. Luckily for Wlad there seems to be a good batch of youngish HWs ripe for him to boost his CV with. Heres hoping he takes as many of them on as possible. Haye, Povetkin, Chagaev, Gomez, Nipple. All could boost Wlad's standing in the long run.