POLL: Wladimir Klitschko's resume....

Ergghhh... no he doesnt, matbe 1 out of every 7 days, and thats being kind.

Lets see what David Haye can do against a top 10 heavyweight/

 

Wlad has beaten some old ****s.

But he has his share of good wins as well.

There's noone great for him to fight so he's done well with who he has to face.

Wlads biggest fights are, in no order, Sultan, Sanders, Brewster 2x, Byrd 2x, Brock, McCline, Barrett,Mercer and Peter.

Sanders and Mercer were old and done. Byrd and Brewster had seen better days in the rematches. The rest were at/around their best.

A lot of fighters like Shufford, Nicholson, Austin or some of those fighters are pure throw aways. Every fighter has those.

Wlad has time to build on what he's already done.

But he has to stop getting knocked out by lesser fighters if he wants to be remembered.

 

Tell the truth...until then you prevent the debate from going forward.

...random remember...???...your still stuck on stupid.:-(

 

Color commentary. :-((

I made my position clear, I have lost nothing. You, however have clearly shown where you have blundered. This poll serves as nothing but a band-aid for the wound you received in the previous thread.

If I ****ed up I would admit, that's one of the major differences between you and me. :bart

 

If you want a next time, I'll tell you right now...finish the one you started.

Retract your accusation that he "randomly picked names."

Admit that's what you yourself did in response.

Admit that when confronted with statistics, you engage in spin, rhetoric, and insulting banter...when if you would have considered the info presented, you may have found a hole in the argument...no though, you'd rather behave as an ass.

Admit that when confronted with facts such as these, you try to turn the conversation sideways...in an attempt to back people into positions, that are not strongly defendable, whether or not they made such claims.

There's more hole's in your debate than a screen door. You are see-through.

 

You're right, Sanders should have been a fill in fight.

His loss made it big when it should have been another knock out on his record.

Brewster is similar ways. If he won Brewster wouldn't have gotten his big fights afterwards and he would be considered another filler.

But Brewster is better than that, he showed with Wlad 1 and post Wlad.

Brewster stated his eye was fine so people shouldn't use that against him.

What the second fight showed was that Wlad was always better than Brewster and shouldn't have lost the first time.

You're probably right, Wlad hasn't beaten that many old ****s,

 

Wladimir is beating everyone he needs to. Some are old, some are young. No there aren't many great fighters in the divison. But that's not really his problem now is it.

 

Magoo made you look like the ignorant fool that you are, many before him have done this, and many more will in the future. I hardly took part in the debate because I was too busy enjoying you pull all your usual stunts when someone shows you up for the biased, childish, ignoramus that you are.

Take comfort in your little poll....surprise surprise there's more ******s than knowledgable posters on here :roll: