Right. The 2nd was no domination by Porter, but you also would have a hard time finding anyone that could look you in the eye and say it was clear for Broner.
This was not a close fight. Anyone who thinks so is either surprised that Broner didn't perform very well (how and why they'd be surprised is a mystery but whatevs...) and trying to justify that it was close or they are Broner fans who know they can't argue he won and so they say it was close. Porter pretty much dominated this fight thanks to Broner thinking that having a low punch output, dancing and holding is the key to winning the fight ¬_¬
I had Broner winning every round... Everytime Porter landed a flush shot Broner quickly shook his head in defiance to show that the punch in actuality didn't land...so by my math Porter didn't land anything.
I agree it was a bad card. I'm not a fan of Porter's sloppy style and Broner had his share of rounds with the cleaner punches landed, particularly some of the middle rounds.
118 - 108 was about the right score. 114-112 was ridicules. There was no way in hell Broner won more then 3 rnds let alone 5 rnds.