Porter-Broner Fight Has A 10 Pound Rehydration Clause

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Lady Girl, Jun 16, 2015.


  1. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,739
    29,307
    Feb 25, 2015
    Will be used as another ducking excuse for the future IMO.

    We already have 17 weight classes, corruption, pussified fighters, purse disagreements, etc.

    Just another obstacle.
     
  2. HellSpawn86

    HellSpawn86 "My heart goes out to you!" Full Member

    18,451
    24,562
    May 6, 2007
    As far as the comment on 16oz of water. 16oz of water is 1lb and anyone who drinks a lb of water will only gain a lb on the scale. However what is true is that some fighters will have a harder time cutting that 1lb depending on how dehydrated they already are.
     
  3. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    Porter's fault for agreeing. No sympathy from me. Don't agree to the terms if you're going to complain about them.
     
  4. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    I think you're missing my point. Yes, one off rehydration clause fights are dangerous. I have never argued against that. But a guy like Porter would not be able to stay at WW for any extended period of time if there were universal rehydration clauses. He would move up to a weight class where he would not need to cut as much weight.

    Quillin and Lee have both weighed 180 on fight night before. They would be SMWs. Fighters still cut weight when there were same day weigh ins and it was more dangerous because their bodies had less time to recover from the dehydration. Go back and watch some 70s and early 80s fights and tell me that same day weigh ins took care of the size difference problem.
     
  5. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    Porter's walking weight is close to 175

    Yeah....fights gonna be cancelled or Porter will be giving his purse to Broner.
    Or....dying in the ring
     
  6. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
  7. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    Aww what's wrong with catchweights? :nut
     
  8. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    Porter's an idiot for agreeing to this. I understand a catchweight but not being able to re-hydrate to his comfortable weight? That's pathetic.
     
  9. tdf1974

    tdf1974 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,119
    2,346
    Sep 9, 2013
    surely 154lb LM is enough??
     
  10. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    Doubtful, Porter used to fight at LMW and is a massive weight drainer at WW. Cutting to 144 and capping out at 154 on fight night will be a totally new experience.
     
  11. tdf1974

    tdf1974 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,119
    2,346
    Sep 9, 2013

    he needed to lose a few lbs imo anyway

    will not do him any harm
     
  12. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    It will do him harm.
     
  13. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,739
    29,307
    Feb 25, 2015
    Not a fan at all.
     
  14. floyd_g.o.a.t

    floyd_g.o.a.t Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,735
    6
    Aug 7, 2010
    OP - All IBF fights state that fighters can only rehydrate up to 10lbs. So Porter has been doing so for his last 3 fights, this isn't going to make any difference to him.

    Don't see if having an impact on the fight and on Shawn's performance.
     
  15. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    You just made everyone look dumb including me!