Post 1970 ATG Rankings

Hi all, what do you make of this list? For those fighters who were active before 1970, I only consider the best version of that fighter post-1970, this results in fighters such as Eder Jofre and Emile Griffith receiving a lower rank than their true p4p H2H ability. I rank based on the p4p ability of the best version of each fighter, not on their career accomplishment/resume. Though obviously, a good resume and accomplishments is highly indicative of a great fighter. Hope you enjoy and appreciate the list, I am open to arguments for changes but I am fairly happy with this list and cannot see myself making massive adjustments.
1)Roberto Duran
2)Muhammad Ali
3)Sugar Ray Leonard
4)Roy Jones Jr
5)Floyd Mayweather Jr
6)Pernell Whitaker
7)Carlos Monzon
8)Marvin Hagler
9)Manny Pacquio
10)Salvador Sanchez
11)Julio Cesar Chavez
12)Jose Napoles
13)James Toney
14)Bernard Hopkins
15)Oscar De La Hoya
16)George Foreman
17)Thomas Hearns
18)Mike McCallum
19)Ruben Olivares
20)Wilfredo Gomez
21)Alexis Arguello
22)Joe Frazier
23)Mike Tyson
24)Emile Griffiths
25)Larry Holmes
26)Joe Calzaghe
27)Andre Ward
28)Canelo Alvarez
29)Terence Crawford
30)Juan Manuel Marquez
31)Azumah Nelson
32)Naoya Inoue
33)Oleksandr Usyk
34)Erik Morales
35)Vasyl Lomachenko
36)Marco Antonio Barrera
37)Michael Spinks
38)Evander Holyfield
39)Gennadiy Golovkin
40)Eder Jofre
41)Miguel Cotto
42)Vicente Saldivar
43)Ricardo Lopez
44)Tyson Fury
45)Niccolino Locche
46)Felix Trinidad
47)Lennox Lewis
48)Wilfred Benitez
49)Aaron Pryor
50)Bob Foster

 

How so? Too low or high in your opinion?

 

I'm a big Frazier fan, the man was an animal. I thought you were going to say too high. Out of the post 1970 heavyweights I have him 3rd, only behind Ali and Foreman. As much as an animal as he was, with an underrated chin in my opinion, I believe in a hypothetical head to head sense he would be vulnerable to some boxer-punchers with enormous power. Thus when considering in a p4p sense, although he may do very well against some of the better movers and his stamina and sheer toughness may allow him to prevail over some of the lesser "boxer punchers", I fear he gets blown out early in a hypothetical sense against some heavy hitters in a p4p sense, ie what happened against Foreman.

 

Not a better fighter than any of those 50 in my opinion.

 

I have to disagree, I believe he has shown more than enough to deserve a place and make me believe he could actually make a few fighters on this list look silly and certainly those on the borderline who missed the cut.

 

Yes, you raise good points in that saldivar was passed his best, though from the famechon fight I don't believe his skills had deteriated drastically as most agree they had a few years later vs Jofre. I believe if a fight was made with Saldivar involved at featherweight on the turn of 1970, he deserves a place in this list. As for Canto, in general the talent pool at flyweight and below is lacking as there is less boxers that size. To deserve a place on this list fighting in those classes, you have to show truly special abilities as Lopez did. As for Cotto, I believe he gets underrated in a historical sense, the man was a beast.

 

Thank you haha