I have not followed the Pac-Floyd drug testing saga as closely as many here as quite frankly it is boring me now. I just want these two to get it on so as we can finally see who is the best. However, from what i can gather Floyd wants blood testing closer to the fight date than what Pac is comfortable with. I'm not to knowledgeable about PED's and drug testing but could both fighters not be blood tested at the longer of date that Pac has suggested and then take another blood test after the fight?
it make sense once the fight is over take the blood test, and if anything is suspicious then ban ... but the questions is, if there is no sign of PED in the blood but it was taken much earlier so it is untraceable at the fight time .. does it help in the performance?
Not after the fight! What good is it if PBF has brain damage after fighting Manny for it to be called a NC after pacman tests positive after the fight?
I guess Manny and thousand other boxers were fighting so far without blood tests (which is standard procedure in every boxing organization) and so far the chance for being brain damage are at the same level as participating in air plain crash due to drunken pilot ... while nobody is ordering tests from the pilots before flight just to be sure they are 100% sober.
Cheers guys. This is why it would be better if there was one governing body for all of this. There could then be year round random drug testing whether a fighter had an upcoming fight or not.
from what i heard it can be cleaned with the help of a different substance in 2 days. Floyd doesn't want pac to possibly trained with PED. and also the ped can still benefit you for a period of time even with you off it.
