Khan beat both Malinaggi & the guy that just beat Broner. So it's okay to rank Khan above Malinaggi, Maidana & Broner
Keith Thurman is not a LOLing matter. So far he KTFO everybody, never seen him hurt or flat on his face. Now contribute....post your Top 10 Welterweight list
So fcking what. Quality of opposition matters...or you'll end up like another Broner. You can't rank him #2 with the resume he has.
That's just my opinion, I have him the same as a Governing body does...Thurman is no ranking buyer either, so its not shocking that I have him in #2 Now post your Top 10, it will only help...make your point
1. Floyd Mayweather 2. Manny Pacquiao 3. Tim Bradley 4. Juan Manuel Marquez 4. Marcos Maidana 5. Shawn Porter 6. Keith Thurman 7. Adrien Broner 8. Paulie Malignaggi 9. Devon Alexander 10. Amir Khan
Adrien Broner is 140 I also want to make Khan #9, but the problem is that he clearly/fairly beat Maidana & Malinaggi, so thats why I rank him #6
Hernandez beat Cunningham twice, he also beat a couple of journeymen just above the CW limit. Where do you rank him at heavyweight?
Its clearly Mayweather, Bradley, Pacquaio, JMM 1-4. Then it's more pickem between Maidana, Thurman, Porter, Brook, Alexander, Malanaggi, Guerrero, Alexander.
I will rank him above Cunningham, who is correctly not in any Top 20 Heavyweight list today...Fighters who can't revnge loses are limited & should be ranked as low as possible #6 Khan always above #7 Maidana & #8 Malinaggi until they rematch...because I don't see how they can beat him anyways The ring decides these things....