Post Your Manny Pacquiao Vs Juan Manuel Marquez II Score Cards

He meant Floyd Mayweather Jr. vs Julio Cesar Chavez (JC Superstar) in a fantasy fight.

 

My scorecard for JMM vs PacMan:

1. 10-9 JMM; Not much from both fighters, the most significant punch was the JMM right hand.

2. 10-9 JMM; If you need an explanation on why JMM won this round than you can excuse yourself from this site.

3. 10-8 PacMan; "He knocked him down!" wailed the Nuthuggers.

4. 10-9 PacMan; Nothing extraordinary from both fighters. Pac just more active.

5. 10-9 JMM; Nothing spectacular from both fighters, but I liked JMM's activity and body punches in this round although they weren't devastating.

6. 10-9 JMM; Big JMM round, and biggest round for either fighter up to this point.

7. 10-9 JMM; Slow round for 1st min or so. JMM hitting Pac with bodyshots, which were largely ignored by HBO crew. Flurry by both fighters with each giving as good as they got. JMM flurries again towards the end, thus winning the round.

8. 10-9 JMM; 2nd big round for JMM, and 2-1 for JMM in big rounds for both fighters.

9. 10-10 round; Slow 1st 1:30, JMM hitting Pac w/bodyshots and 1 big jab by Pac. JMM finishes with two good right hands. Although the HBO crew was oohing and aahing for PacMan, his punches weren't connecting like they said they did. I did have the advantage of replay, but even in the original broadcast, I felt they were exaggerating the effectiveness of Pac's punches. I couldn't give that round to Pac because I honestly felt he didn't do enough.

10. 10-9 PacMan; Staggered JMM in the first :30 secs. 2nd big round for Pac. Enough said.

11. 10-9 JMM; another solid round by JMM.

12. 10-9 JMM; 3rd big round for JMM, and although it really doesn't matter, JMM had a 3-2 advantage in big or really dominant rounds, IMO.

FINAL: 116-112 JMM.

For the record, it was a good competitive fight, but I had JMM as the clear cut winner. He hit Pac with some really beautiful combinations, and really controlled that fight with the exception of the 3rd and 10th round. I will gladly watch any rounds in questions by other posters to see if I may have missed something, but specify which rounds and roughly the timeframe.

P.S.

Mexicutioner my ass!!!:deal

 

P.S.

don't get riled up too much ringking.

pac sending mexican greats to the canvas is an established fact.

 

It might be an established fact. But it is an established fact that your boy couldn't keep JMM down and got schooled for his troubles. It's also an established fact that Morales, who was on his last legs, put a quick end to the Pac hype in their first fight. Keep hanging onto the thread that keeps you sane. I'm sure you'll sleep better at night. :hi:

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl. sure thing *****.

keep your hopes up for JMM before he gets whipped by PBF. and i hope he avenges his defeat to chris john. :hey:yep

 

Scatt,

IF JMM wll not win over PBF believe me. BET your house and car, the fight between pac vs jmm will be RECYLCED again coz they KNOW the wins over MAB, CASA and Juan Diaz is PRACTICALLY NOTHING compared to the DRAW that JMM got from PAC.

How funny that Divac accuses all the judges of being corrupt everytime HE DOES NOT LIKE THE RESULTS but when THE stupid JUDGE made a mistake which caused the fight be a draw. That JUDGE suddenly is NOT corrupt! WHY?! Coz the mistake caused PAC the win. If it's was JMM who was in PAC shoes and the judge made a mistake which favored PAC that round!

HELL WILL BREAK LOSE! That IDIOT judge will be LABALLED corrupt!!!!!

 

:yep. still laughing at divac insistence on rd. 8 being scored 10-9 instead of his preferred 10-8 score.

ey, divac, how about round 3??:rofl :rofl

3 KD's in round 1 of pac-jmm 1 and it was scored 10-7. hilarious. :rofl:rofl

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl Your pathetic attempts at insults are laughable at best.

JMM may very well get beat by PBF, and there is no shame in that. Fighting and losing to a bigger, faster, stronger, and younger fighter is nothing to hang your head about. It's called having a set of testicles, and wanting to test yourself against the best. Look at the bright side, he could have followed the Pac route of recycling the same fighters. Hell, he should have fought Casamayor or Juan Diaz three more times each.

Tell Pac to go avenge the fight where he got KNOCKED THE **** OUT.

 

had too much sour grapes in the morning i guess. :hi::hi::hi:

testicles? you think your girl jmm has more balls than pac? pac has been fighting bigger fighters than him practically all his life and you think jmm has more balls than the guy.

pac went up to 135, 140 and 147 way before your girlie idol did. jmm just followed pac career path in the same way jmm followed pac wobbled and disoriented to pacs corner in the 2nd fight. :yep:hey

 

Keep guessing.

Oh, you mean he was dehydrating himself to have a size advantage. Yes, thanks I knew that already. By the way, when you turn 25 or so you'll probably be on the northside of 150 compared to your current age of 10, and weight of 100 lbs. No matter how much you diet or exercise, you will never be at a healthy 100 lbs again. It's called growing into an adult.

Yes, he challenged the legendary David Diaz at 135. You know, the one that would have knocked out Sal Sanchez, Azumah Nelson, Alexis Arguello, Julio Cesar Chavez, and Pac's daddy JMM.

He went to 147 to fight a businessman who couldn't "pull the trigger anuymore" according to, guess who? Pac's very own trainer.

He beat the painfully overrated Hatton at 140, which was a decent win.

Watch Pac do the chicken dance at the end of Round Two. It's hilarious!

 

I think I read somewhere that Juan Manuel Marquez was Pacquiao's biological father.

 

This content is protected

 

round 3 should be 10-5 due to pac's dominance...

10-8

This content is protected

10-7

This content is protected

10-6--10-5

thinking roach was nacho (10-6) ... and ref holding him back (10-5) that was a major ownage saved by the bell...

This content is protected

:good:good:good

so Rd 3. 10-5 due to massive ownage deal:deal

 

Manny Marquez lost that fight. Accept it.

 

You're absolutely correct......

....the thing about my prolonged interaction in this thread, is not to argue who won between JMM and Pac, but to probe and educate some of these *******s on they score, I score, and how by history judges tend to score rounds of the sort when there's a knockdown involved and when there's not.......

......and just when I think I'm getting to where wow, I'm exchanging real opinions and discussing semi-intelligently with a bonafide *******.......out of the blue here comes a ******* throwing a wrench to the discussion by vehemently claiming something that is irrelevant to the discussion, that round 3 should have been 10-7 Pac because there should have been a 2nd knockdown scored.atsch

The issue was why would someone score round 8 a 10-8 for JMM, but give round 3 where Pac scored a knockdown the same 10-8.

Clearly I give them examples of past fights and how judges score such rounds......but sadly these *******s cant stay on topic and revert to what comes natural to them......."being clueless."lol:

Hey 4Rounder, have you've ever seen a fight where a judge scored a 10-7 round where there was only one knockdown?