Post Your Manny Pacquiao Vs Juan Manuel Marquez II Score Cards

Truth is I try to be as objective as I can when scoring fights. :good

But this fight was the epitome of a close fight. Damn.

 

i had it 114-113 for pac
u have to give the close rounds to pac 'cause he was the one pushing the action
and check the parry and blocks of pac in those rounds
zoom it and you will understand what I'm talking about:hey

 

Doesn't matter, whoever is looking at it.
The concept of 'trinity' is not there!
And the word isn't found there.... in an English Bible, a Semitic Bible, any language. It doesn't matter who is looking at it, it isn't there!
It's like someone looking on the Hawaiian flag and saying the British flag isn't present on it... or someone looking at the USA flag & saying the British flag IS there.

The issue of trinity IS obvious once you look it up.
Nowhere in the OT & nowhere in the NT either.
It's just that ppl are ignorant.

It's like ppl saying Tito had an illegal substance in his wraps (which he didn't but what he was doing was still illegal!). Popular ignorant myth.

 

Pacquiao - Marquez II

1 10-9
2 9-10
3 10-8
4 10-9
5 9-10
6 9-10
7 10-9
8 9-10
9 10-9
10 10-9
11 9-10
12 9-10

114-113 Pacquiao

 

The truth is always relative. The "holy trinity" is the most basic tenet of the Roman Catholic doctrine and most Christian religion that to discount its validity questions the basic foundation of its teachings and doctrine : the Divinity of Jesus Christ. The Bible for one may not explicitly state the word but then again various verses are openly interpreted to denote the concept.

Apparently, when Jesus said, "Me and my Father are one' and several vertses, was taken to cenote this confusing and vague concept.

As to the truth nor validity of such Doctrine, who are we to say they are wrong or right. We can noteven agree on a simple thing like who won the jmm-pac 2 fight, how much more with such complex and connfusing doctrines. For Christians, the "Holy Trinity" is truth. It does not nedcessarily mean that I subscribe to it.

 

114-113 jmm

 

It doesnt matter how many close rounds you give to one fighter if you are rooting for the other.

If Fighter A wins 51% of every round to fighter B's 49%, Im scoring all 12 rounds to fighter A. Im not going to give Fighter B some of those rounds because I believe Fighter A has been getting too much of the benefit of the doubt of the close rounds.

 

Draw, 114-114.

 

In most close fights like the JMM-Pac2, most of the time it is the aggressor who gets the nods with the judges. I am not saying that it is the right call or not, but that is basically is a pattern in boxing. Plus the fact that the significant punch - the one that causes knockdowns was delivered by Pac.

We may try to hair-split round per round but in the end it is probably the right call. However, if it happened that JMM was declared the winner, I have no problem with it as most likely the judges gave those close rounds to JMM.

 

I agree with this, don't know why you thought I had a different view than this one.

The guy said "people who root for fighter A will give him more of the close rounds", and I said although I rooted for JMM, I didn't give him the close rounds just cause I rooted for him, I gave them to the fighter I thought won them.

 

Rounds 1, 9 and maybe 11 are a ***** to score.

 

everyone aside from pac fans: marquez 115-112 or 114-113, being generous.

for the zillionth time - check the threads immediately after the fight, including all posters, not the more recent threads flooded by *******s. its clear who the forum thought won.

 

It surely isn't.