Post Your Pic/Talk About Anything Thread

1 interesting poll :
***********.boxingforum24.com/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=36970
and sainc dis sait cenzors its own linx ez wel :
boxingforum24.com/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=36970

 

youtube.com/watch?v=UMyoCr2MnpM

 

haw wud u r8 dem in deir praims ? :
Michael Stefano , Nacho Vidal , Rocco Siferedi , Manuel Ferara .
nd haw wud fit Tyce Bune & Alex Sanders in ?

 

It is not the person whose opinion is closest to yours.

It is not the person who will back you up in an argument.

It is the person whose opinion is most different to yours, who provides you with the best constructive counter argument.

That is the person that you will learn most from.

If you already know everything, then you don’t need me, and there is no reason to be here.

 

usually i agree with red cobra, steve g, he grant, unforgiven, the southpaw ,sometimes with mr magoo, tommygun711 and mrbill, of the "new" posters i definitely agree fecuently with shawn kemp .
i think that every old poster from the old classic forum know his stuff of boxing, simply yo can find partial or impartial guys. for example i respect your Knowledge (janitor) but you are a bit partial in favor of the old school fighters, you pick dempsey against almost anyone. bummydavis for example knows his crap but he is partial 100% in favor of his favourite fighters and then sometimes you can read good comments from him, ,but their favourite fighters win always, he said once that marciano would beat foreman prime vs prime based on that old foreman took too many shots from qawi...please..., he said that morrison had mw chin because he got stopped by 2 full sized hws, but joe louis(one of his heros) did not have mw chin when he got stopped by the 190s pounder max schmeling or dropped by the 180s pounder walcott or the former lhw skinny bradock...
anthony is not any ignorant but when he hates a guy he is partial like hell... he is saying that foreman was 6´2 1/2 , holyfield was 6´0 3/4 .. tyson was 5´9.... according to him every height of any fighter is wrong... absolutely ridiculous... george foreman was 6´3 1/2 close to 6´4, evander was 6´2 and tyson was 5´10 1/2, mike was clearly taller than ray leonard and he was close to frazier who was listed 5´11, and evander was clearly taller than hearns who was 6´1.
i disagree with ironchamp but he was one of the few tysonfanboys who always had a good answer for you.
rockysplitnoise i agree with him sometimes, and sometimes not, he makes great argument but he is a bit partial too, principally with marciano,walcott and charles. but yes, i disagree with several guys but i respect them because they make good answer for me.

 

You are never going to get to the same place as somebody at the other side of the scale, but the least they can do is give you a new angle on something, or take you 10% closer to them.

 

Janitor
Burt

 

Mcgrain, burt Bienstock, Seamus...

 

For me it's Magna, hands down.

 

John Garfield, Ted Spoon, Magnasakki, Stonehands. There have been some excellent boxing guys on here.

 

I love how almost nobody picks up on the fact that in the OP there is no actual question being asked. :yep

It's written in more of a fortune cookie style.

 

Burt and the Giant Beanstalk

John Garfield (he was great in Body and Soul)

 

Is magna gone? His true identity is not so inspiring.

 

Il Duce, Duodendum or whatever it is....

 

what is his "true identity"? are you trying to say he faked the whole sparring partner thing?