mine....not nessesarily in order.. 1. les darcy 2. jeff fenech 3. kostya tszu 4. lionel rose 5. dave sands 6. jeff harding 7. tony mundine 8. johnny famechon 9. vic patrick 10 young griffo honorary mentions...(not active) barry michael lester ellis ron richards danny green charkey ramon rick thornberry aussie joe bugner bob fitzsimons (kiwi?) rocky gatellari tony madigan troy, dean, guy waters if ive missed someone, please add your own...
Hmmm...nah I dont think so. Tony beat a future HOF, many very good contenders from middle up to heavyweight and was world ranked in more than one division when it really was something special to be ranked because there was only 1 belt. He jumped in the ring with argueably the best middleweight ever, who would be as good as all of Choc's opponants in his whole career combined. He did an australian equivalent of Henry Armstrong by holding the national light heavy, cruiser and heavy titles at the same time, back when they meant something because it was the only "regional" around. He held commonwealth titles when you could just about consider them as legit as the WBA toy belt his son was awarded. He fought nearly 100 pro fights across the globe. What Anthony has done is amazing but what it means to be a champ today has been diluted. I think to decide these rankings you really have to analyse the respective careers of the people you are ranking and the circumstances of their situation and era. What Mundine Sr went through to achieve what he achieved is a much greater feat than what Mundine Jr has done so far IMO anyway.
Gonzo if your going to have a vendetta against a mundine, then let it be on jnr who could only wish he was half the fighter his ol man was.