Duke above Benn!? Duke himself would feel embarrassed about that. I just can't justify Hatton above ****ing Eubank Sr either. Bless him. Watching that Collazo fight right now and there's zero finesse. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/sport/2003/jul/12/boxing.comment
He brought nothing to the table anyway. You could fill the ocean with what Froch doesn't know about Boxing.
Yeah but at 140 he only fought prime Pacquiao I don't rate mugging old semi retired Tzsyu with the aid of your personal referee
Ricky pretty much knocked himself out against Floyd and Manny, seriously. Jumping in head first, and, walking in at perfect angle with chin exposed.
Sadly, he doesn't take the gig seriously, does no homework, half-asses it and picks up a cheque. If it was something he approached with a passion, he could do a good job.
I'm normally on the other side for Naz debates, but he's way too low at #7. Johnson, Kelley, Bungu, Medina, Vazquez, McCullough etc is way beyond what the vast majority of British fighters in the modern era have achieved. Yes, he got most of them at the right time and got spanked by Barrera, but he cleaned out a division and dominated it for years, and only ever lost to a first-ballot Hall of Famer. Lewis should be above Calzaghe. Haye is too high, and McKenzie shouldn't be top 10. Moving across divisions a few pounds apart with a WLWL career at world class doesn't compare to what some others like Froch achieved. McKenzie did for triple champions what Leo Gamez did for quadruple champions a few years later.
His performance against Pacquiao was truly embarrassing, especially considering Pacquiao and his team had repeatedly stated he would ko Hatton with the exact sequence he did. Hatton was arrogant and dillusional, couldn't accept he wasn't good enough to beat Mayweather and entered the ring Vs pac truly beliving being "fooking massive at 140" would get him the win. I enjoyed seeing him being laid flat