Pound 4 Pound - Who is the Best….

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Eubank, Nov 20, 2008.


  1. Eubank

    Eubank Active Member Full Member

    1,264
    1
    Mar 22, 2008
    Shut the **** up with this meaningless P4P bull****. Wlad is better than Calzaghe who is better than Pacquiao. Any P4P comparisons are completely meaningless. If a Heavyweight was the size of Ricky Hatton then he would not be the same fighter. It is impossible to compare them.
     
  2. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Forget the H2H stuff in P4P talk. You base them on achievement and ability. The H2H is far too subjective.
     
  3. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I think anyone who starts off a new thread with "Shut the **** up..." should get the boot.
     
  4. Eubank

    Eubank Active Member Full Member

    1,264
    1
    Mar 22, 2008
    But if a boxer was in another weight division then he would not develop into the same fighter, a comparison between them is absurd. A cruiserweight could never have the speed, stamina and mobility of a flyweight. If Darchinyan were a Cruiser then he would have to fight a completely different style thus making comparisons irrelevant.
     
  5. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Er, that isn't what pound-for-pound means though. To decide who is a greater fighter pound-for-pound between Ricardo Lopez and Lennox Lewis, you don't imagine a 5 feet tall 7 stone Lewis or a 6ft 5in 245lbs Lopez! :lol: Are you serious?! Pound-for-pound means ranking fighters by how good they were at their own weight and through what they achieved at the weights they fought at. Example: Pernell Whitaker is a greater fighter pound-for-pound than Kelly Pavlik because Whitaker was a better lightweight than Pavlik was a middleweight, as he proved by beating better opposition and being more dominant at his own weight. Whitaker also achieved more - winning more world titles at more weights. You cannot compare them h2h because they never fought at the same weights, and you cannot scale them up or down as that would inherently change them thus rendering the comparison utterly pointless.
     
  6. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    I endorse this post and it's author. He and I were at odds early on but have since recognized the value in eachother's opinion.

    Thank you.
     
  7. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    We have indeed. :good
     
  8. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    And there you have it.
     
  9. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Seconded.
     
  10. Williams27

    Williams27 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,582
    3
    Nov 18, 2008
    P4P debates are simple heres an example - Marvin Hagler is a better
    P4P then say someone like Buster Douglas because Hagler did more and did better at 160 then Buster did at HW overall. Then you can say Sugar Ray Robinson and Muhammad Ali are close at a P4P perspective because Robinson did great and did alot from 147 - 160 lbs and Ali did great and alot at HW and they are some what comparable because of their accomplishments. All P4P rankings do is compare accomplishments of the great fighters not who would beat who on the list unless they were roughly the same weight.
     
  11. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    Calzaghe should have a slight edge here he has been consistant hasnt lost a single fight, and has dominated all of his recent opponents.
     
  12. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    LoL. What a ******. This fool might as well go and argue with himself, starting a thread like this
     
  13. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    John Ruiz.
     
  14. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    LoL. You just beat me to it
     
  15. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    :lol: