Pound 4 Pound - Who is the Best….

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Eubank, Nov 20, 2008.


  1. The Phenom

    The Phenom Pretty Handsome Full Member

    4,245
    352
    Aug 30, 2008
    I always enjoy the pound for pound debate.
     
  2. kartog

    kartog Agent Smith Full Member

    3,975
    84
    Sep 8, 2006
    Cracked me up nya ha ha ha!!! :rofl
     
  3. warrior85

    warrior85 R.I.P THUNDER Full Member

    11,865
    3
    May 30, 2007
    p4p is&always has been just a matter of personal opinion,its up to you how seriously or lightly you regard it.
     
  4. skier47

    skier47 Guest

    Good explanation. Unfortunately almost noone uses this standard to judge fighter's abilities lb.forlb. If they did they would have to put Wlad Klitschko in their top 10 rankings but never do. Here's a long-term dominant heavyweight champion who even his detractors admit fights anybody put in front of him. He has brutalized one top ten contender after another for years now. He has unified two titles and travels internationally to fight which takes a toll on the body. Some argue the division is weak but that's beyond Wlad's control and is therefore irrelevent to the discussion. Also he has fought all styles of fighters and won against big punchers like Brewster and Peter to slick boxers like Chris Byrd and fellow giants like Thompson and Austin. Instead you see an unproven Kelly Pavlik and other fighters like Chad Dawson vaulting into many peoples's lb. for lb. rankings after one or two good performances. When people start actually using your well thought out standard of judging that so many posters seem to agree with then maybe other posters will take all pound for pound discussions more seriously.
     
  5. heidegger

    heidegger Guest

    Your point is valid but I tend to judge boxers P4P on who is the best overall athlete. In that way you could pretty rank people P4P coming from different sports.........
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,092
    Mar 21, 2007
    p4p isn't for everyone. No need to curse it out though.
     
  7. heidegger

    heidegger Guest

    I wouldn't say it's irrelavant. If he doesn't have the races to run in we can't give him the medals.
     
  8. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,372
    3,783
    Feb 20, 2008
    I agree. These P4P idiots think they are playing Dungeons and Dragons or something with this P4P crap. It is all fantasy and conjecture.

    If you are in the P4P top 10 in the world and you can't move up 1 weight class and win a fight it means you were NEVER P4P to begin with.
     
  9. skier47

    skier47 Guest

    Irrelavant is probably too strong but Wlad hasn't just beat turkeys. A lot of his opponents were undefeated and ranked as number 1 when he fought them. Calvin Brock was number 1 U.S. based heavy when Wlad starched him and Wlad beat some former champs and even a co-champion in amateur standout Sergei from Russia.