Pound 4 Pound... who is the better fighter ? Calzaghe or Lewis ?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Bill Butcher, Nov 19, 2008.


  1. D_XZ

    D_XZ Member Full Member

    470
    0
    Jun 21, 2008
    but that doesn't account for how their attributes may change with weight. Would JC be able to keep his workrate up if he weighed and extra 3 - 5 stones? Would Lewis get much faster and busier if he was about 6 stone smaller? Would his power be the same?

    This is the whole problem with the entire p4p thing.
     
  2. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    81
    Sep 3, 2007
    :lol:

    Are you noising me up ?

    I have a very good understanding of body types & size, I know the heavier you are, the more chance of a KO & the smaller weights dont produce as many.... BUT... Lewis being bigger by 20 or 30 lbs vs some opponents DOES matter & IT IS a very significant advantage.

    Lewis should be KOing them with the 1st decent punch he lands & if his technique is what it should be as a supposed ATG then he should not be getting hit bang on the button by those 220 lb men, especially when they werent exactly A level fighters themselves.

    What about consistency vs guys they should beat... that goes to Calzaghe also... surely that matters when judging`greatness.`


    Botswana :smoke
     
  3. margo82

    margo82 Active Member Full Member

    906
    0
    Sep 24, 2008
    If Calzaghe's at HW, then Mitchell, Hopkins and Jones may have all been lights out instead of just knockdowns.

    That's the peril of being a HW, one clean punch can end it at any time.

    The truth of the matter is, Lewis has a much better resume and because of that, I'd say he's the better fighter.
     
  4. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Skill wise, personally, I think Lennox's skills are far superior P4P then Calzaghe's. I couldn't ever see any heavy weight in the history of the division (over 100 years) making Lewis look as amateur(embarrassing) as a 43 year old Bernard Hopkins (who eventually got defeated on work rate and stamina alone) made Calzaghe look at times.
     
  5. Dunky McCafferty

    Dunky McCafferty Boxing Junkie banned

    10,067
    2
    Aug 24, 2004
    Lennox Lewis pisses all over Calzaghe, the man who thinks hes above rematches, even when he wins by dodgy majority decisions.

    Lewis beat them all, had trilogies the lot, Calzaghe? When was the last time he even KO'd someone?
    Sorry to make my argument so basic, but when you look at the basics Lewis was the complete package, & Calzaghe? well, he wasnt.

    Basically.
     
  6. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    81
    Sep 3, 2007
    So by this way of thinking, the greatness of guys like Pep & Whitaker should be knocked ?

    :huh
     
  7. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    81
    Sep 3, 2007
    Hopkins is an ATG & his main strength is making opponents look bad... you conveniently miss out the fact that Hopkins won all his fights comfortably at 175, all except for Calzaghe, that shows the boxing talent of the man.

    Ps. I have a feeling that Muhammad Ali in his prime would do a better number on Lewis that Hopkins could ever dream of doing to Calzaghe so thats that HWT comment ****ed in my view tho you will probably try debate it. :nut
     
  8. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    81
    Sep 3, 2007
    I always give Lennox Lewis his due - I also try keep some of your feet on the ground as you think he is something he is not - Lewis was the best HWT since Tyson of the 80s... He had very good textbook skills, was a good finisher when he had a man in trouble, when in shape his stamina was good for such a big man, he had good power & he didnt have the best of chins.

    I just dont see his skills & abilities as being on the same level as Calzaghe`s.

    I keep hearing about this vastly superior resume of Lewis but Ive already given my views on that... there is nothing to choose between Joe & LLs resume, you are kidding yourselves on... he has got a shot Tyson, past prime Holyfield & prime Vitali that was on his way to victory before the cut (any non-biased fan could see that.)

    Does it really matter that Lewis fought those guys in America & Calzaghe fought all but Jones & Hopkins outside the states ? :huh

    That way of thinking baffles me... if Joe had went to America & beat the rest of the SMWTs like he did outside the USA should that entitle him to be percieved as greater ?.... I mean the fighters were still the same, he cleaned out the division, whats the difference ?

    The thread was originally about who is the better fighter as far as ability - Calzaghe wins this hands down as his current p4p status suggests, I mean Lennox was never close to being called the no1 & for good reason.

    My honest feeling is... if you TRULY believe that Lewis was a more skillfull & versatile fighter than Calzaghe then you are either biased towards Calzaghe for whatever reason or are a die hard Lewis fan that cannot see ****.

    Im glad that Calzaghe is generally viewed as the best British fighter by experts & media because if it were up to some of you then there would be a terrible injustice.... ****in hell, you lot drive me to drink :patsch


    Botswana :smoke
     
  9. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    I'm a big fan of both of them, used to love watching LL fight. If I had to choose one over the other I'd give the edge to Calzaghe - very close though.
     
  10. toffeejack

    toffeejack Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,064
    1
    Apr 30, 2007
    Lewis had trilogies? :huh

    In fact the only rematches he ever had were ones where he got KTFO in and the Holyfield one.

    Calzaghe > Lewis p4p.

    Holyfield > Lewis p4p.
    Tyson > Lewis p4p.

    I could go on. Lewis was a great fighter but come on look at the physical advantages he carried in the ring with him. Holyfield gave Lewis a competitive fight in the second fight despite being the much smaller man.
     
  11. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007

    No way, the skill difference between a 43 year old, recently twice beaten Hopkins, and Joe was clearly evident. Calzaghe could hardly land anything of note - nobody does that to Lewis! The fact that Joe scraped a much debated split decision by outworking (the same thing a younger busy Taylor did to Hopkins twice before Joe) over a 43 old Hopkins really does cloud the gulf in skill that was clearly evident in that fight. When Hopkins was more busy, and not gassing badly (ultimately due to age), he was winning the fight.

    Lewis does better against any heavyweight in the over 100 year history of the division, then Joe does against at least two names in the last 15 years around 168, imo.

    When people talk about amazing skill, and Calzaghe - I really don't see this! I see a guy with exceptional stamina, a very good chin, and a huge "punch output". Of cause he is more then that, but those are the main things he brings to the table.

    Joe's defence is not that tight or skillful - he often gets caught, and saved by his chin; he often leaves himself wide open. His offence largely consists of throwing huge volumes of punches that are not accurate, and it's debatable whether a lot of them are actual punches - he also has very poor power. Lewis is streets ahead skill wise, imo, he is the complete package.

    Bill I think your fondness of Joe the fighter is somehow clouding your judgement. The fact that you say Calzaghe could do very well, and cut it in the Cruiser division (25lbs extra weight) by " ...unleashing a big bomb every now & then just to keep the cruiser guessing" - says it all. You also have Joe as the current P4P no1 when he clearly is not! Now you have him as being Greater then Lennox Lewis. Fair enough if those are your opinions, and you're entitled to them - but unlike you, personally I do not think he would cut it against the top Cruisers, he's not the current P4P no1, and he's not Greater then Lennox Lewis.
     
  12. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    Don't forget Bruno was outboxing LL prior to getting stopped.
     
  13. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    Lewis is so self evidently superior to Calzaghe that the argument is just not worth making
     
  14. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    4,429
    15
    Oct 2, 2006
    exactly:good
     
  15. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    I can't even believe this question is being asked.

    Even TFFP (probably Calzaghe's biggest OBJECTIVE fan on the Brit forum) put Lewis in a top 5 - with Calzaghe 6-10 on a British ATG list.

    Must say I am inclined to agree, with Lewis at #1.