pound for pound RJJ is the best EVER

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jkdking, May 11, 2009.


  1. MaliSlamusrex

    MaliSlamusrex Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,249
    1
    Nov 10, 2008
    RJJ as a boxer he has some skills, and can do some things i have never seen anyone else do. I would say he is a unique boxer who at his best could beat anyone. but he is inconsistent so you can't say he was the best ever.
     
  2. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    In a time machine match I'd take RJ over any middleweight.

    Not talking about title fights or matching or resume or greatness.

    Just watch him and watch the fighters you think could beat him. If you have a good eye for boxing you'll see the closest thing to an unbeatable fighter. In the words of Triple H, he's just that good...:yep
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007

    That there is pure video game analysis. These things are decided in the detials, but you totally missed my point.

    Fighters improve - vastly - with top line experience. I don't pick fighters to beat Jones at 160 because they "did more" or "achieved more" but beause being matched at the highest level makes fighters better, inevitably.

    Nobody was talking about how Hopkins "always takes away his opponents best weapon" in 1995. He learned that and people started saying it around 2002. He got better with championship experience.

    Jones did too.

    And so did the men you are picking Jones over because he "looks unbeatable".
     
  4. jkdking

    jkdking Active Member Full Member

    1,316
    3
    Apr 8, 2006
    and when roy jones catches bob foster flush what happens

    like he did to Reggie Johnson
     
  5. jkdking

    jkdking Active Member Full Member

    1,316
    3
    Apr 8, 2006
    bob foster would never land he was to slow
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
    Doesn't matter! Iron Chin Jones would probably let Foster land, just for a joke.
     
  7. jkdking

    jkdking Active Member Full Member

    1,316
    3
    Apr 8, 2006
    just for laughs like he did in the first tarver fight

    lolol
     
  8. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    I disagree.

    Thats why we (msg-boarders) are so often so wrong. Pacqiuo/Hatton for example. You can pick over details to convince yourself of anything.

    Just watch the fighters at their best, and if you have good boxing nouse you will likely be able to pick the best fighter, its deceptively easy. This is how I pick winners if I'm gambling, and I do OK.
     
  9. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,385
    3,796
    Feb 20, 2008
    Roy Jones NEVER beat an undisputed, unified, or linear champion in his whole career.

    His resume does not stack up to any of the legit ATG's.

    He had no Chin and no heart and handpicked 98% of his fights.

    His whole career was smoke and mirrors.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
    No, we are so often wrong on the boards because the "easy" pick, faster, stronger, bigger, is so often wrong due to intangibles. Jones looks great to you so you'd pick him.

    I'll stick my neck out. There are NO fighters, in the HISTORY of boxing in ANY weight division outside of heavy, with twenty odd fights, two or three of them at the top level, who will beat consistantly great, primed competition from the absolute roof of their division.

    It just doesn't happen like that in the fight game.
     
  11. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Stick to wrestling... the MWT Robinson that stopped JLM in 1951 would hand any MWT RJJ his ass.
     
  12. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    Of course 'analysis' itself is not a 'bad' thing.

    But you can overdo it; minutiae of style match-ups etc are sometimes uselful, but mainly one fighter is patently better than another.

    The ESB poster san rafael made some quite intelligent, long-winded arguments about how Hatton would be a stylistic nightmare for Pac and beat him. It made a lot of sense. Then some n00b with 50 posts would say 'Pac will KO his wel too fast'.

    The n00b was right :lol:

    Details, sure - knowing which details are relevant and when, different thing.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007

    Mostly I agree with you.

    But we're not talking here about predicting the outcomes of fights, we're talking about the very best fighters in history who achieved the most during their absolute primes fighting a guy with 23/24 fights under his belt, the first 15/16 of which were rather famously, glorified sparring sessions put on by an overprotective/jealous father.

    He looked great because he was extraordinarliy athletic. He was fast and he hit hard. Of course he looked great. But he new very, very little of the sport of proffesional boxing.

    Now let's put him in with the version of Monzon that kicked the **** out of Griffith the second time. ****ing 79-3. Campaigning at the highest level for years. In his 8th unified title defence. Absolutley perfected his art.

    Monzon doesn't look as flash. But he'd win.
     
  14. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    Nice sig gif :yep


    ps, did you know that the Middleweights before the 1980's would likely be Welterweights or JuniorWelterweights with todays weigh-in rules?
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
    Probably not though. Guys came into the ring very dry so it doesn't mean they wouldn't re-hydrate if they were fighting under moder rules, I don't think. Sugar was 5'11 which is still pretty tall for a welter, he'd just weigh more by fight time.

    Think about Cotto. Under old rules he would have hopped up onto the scales, hit 147, got into the ring. Under modern rules, he hops up onto the scales, hits 147, goes home and rehydrates up to 155 plus.

    Old-rule fighters under modern rules would do exactly the same thing, often. There were guys that fought at their comfortable weight, but many of them had to live that weight (after all, if you're weighting 148 you're in with the MW's).