Pound for Pound SHOULD BE ABOLISHED!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Undisputed520, Nov 2, 2008.


  1. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    I don't think we disagree much. ;)
     
  2. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Im in there too. Its hard to explain p4p, but you just know it when ya see it. Like when Mayweather was around, or when Roy was prime, those guys were the definition of p4p.
     
  3. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    :good

    People are talking like P4P ratings are the only ratings that are completely relative to the person viewing/writing them. All ratings are going to vary, some are going to be ridiculous, others accurate, but as long as you have basic knowledge its pretty easy to separate them.
     
  4. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Yep, but some fans dont even have that basic knowledge and ridiculous names get thrown on the list
     
  5. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Word on that bro. :verysad
     
  6. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    p4p is a matter of opinion, but some opinions are worth more than others, and things like resume, skills, strength, power, etc. are just arguments to back up those opinions about which fighter is better than who.

    its here to stay.

    before they invented the term pound for pound for sugar ray robinson, you still had the concept of p4p, with guys like Henry Armstrong, and many more.
     
  7. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Another thing, ppl always seem to think that their p4p list has to contain 10 names
     
  8. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    You have a point!

    I guess when ppl nowdays think of "p4p" they immediately think "top10" as well.
     
  9. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Yep. And like I said, there could be a time in the sport where you dont even have 1 true pound 4 pound fighter. Ppl gotta stick to the original definition of p4p. But saying Pavlik & Margarito are p4p fighters is ridiculous. Watch in the next few weeks ppl are gonna start saying Arthur Abrahm is a p4p fighter
     
  10. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Agreed, that's ridiculous indeed.

    Saying one is a good fighter is one thing, but saying one's p4p is another.
    Christ I've seen some posts where people put Darchinyan in the top 10. :yikes
     
  11. sthomas

    sthomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,002
    6
    Jul 14, 2007
    P4P is for fun @ the pubs, nothing more nothing less. Almost everyone compares a little mans skills to a big man, as if the little mans skills would remain the same if he magically transformed into a heavyweight. Usually it's not considered if the big man shrunk. Noone knows how good Ali would have been if he was a middle weight. Imagine his speed and reflexes actually improving if he was smaller. Compare Ali's early speed and skills to the average heavyweight and the difference was arguably greater than the advantages SRR had over the competition.
     
  12. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
  13. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    I just ask myself who is the better fighter. Nothing more, and nothing less.
     
  14. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    To be honest a lot of the time little guys get underrated. The middle weights (meaning around 160, not specifically the MW division) seem to get the most hype in P4P lists. Guys like Pavlik getting put up into 4,5,6 territory by most people after a couple of good wins.
     
  15. owell

    owell Active Member Full Member

    1,464
    0
    Jul 20, 2008
    What! ...and make ESB forum dull...
    Who wants to stop the merry makings here on ESB???