Nobody seems to have spotted this, not that they'd care anyway. My pound-for-pound top ten goes: 1. Henry Armstrong 2. Harry Greb 3. Ray Robinson 4. Benny Leonard 5. Ezzard Charles 6. Roberto Duran 7. Willie Pep 8. Archie Moore 9. Joe Gans 10. Barney Ross (Recently interchanged Pep & Duran) But then my top three lightweights are: 1. Benny Leonard 2. Roberto Duran 3. Ike Williams And both lists are supposed to be based on accomplishments. Surely Williams would be in place of Gans? More like I should remove Gans and replace him with someone more deserving who isn't Williams. Sam Langford? For a while now I've criminally left him out of my list giving the poor 'uncertainty' excuse, but then there's uncertainty issues with Greb, too. Just have to take that chance I suppose. So, new list: 1. Henry Armstrong 2. Harry Greb 3. Ray Robinson 4. Benny Leonard 5. Sam Langford 6. Ezzard Charles 7. Roberto Duran 8. Willie Pep 9. Archie Moore 10. Barney Ross Gans #4 lightweight.
If you don't have Langford in the top 10 p4p, there's something wrong. But I think Gans can be justified in a top 10 birth, although I don't have him there my own self.
Mine is pretty ripped at the moment anyway. I'll offer up the following - 01 - Sam Langford 02 - Harry Greb 03 - Sugar Ray Robinson 04 - Henry Armstrong 05 - Ezzard Charles 06 - Muhammad Ali 07 - Mickey Walker 08 - Roberto Duran 09 - Willie Pep 10 - Bob Fitzsimmons The next clutch is a mess. It would consist of Barbados Joe Walcott, Joe Gans, Benny Leonard. Archie Moore, whom I feel you are guilty of overating (consistantly, at least!) would be #14. Then come Burley (I know), Barney Ross, Jimmy McLarnin, Joe Louis...I used to have a lovely neat 55, now it's ruined. Learning isn't easy I guess
yeh definitly obviously fighters like Fitzsimmons, Langford, Jack Johnson, Joe Gans etc... are great but the ruleset was alot different and its alot harder to actually see how good these guys were compared to later eras.
Overrating Benny Leonard or Archie Moore? You can't deny Leonard, surely. He did a lot more than Fitzsimmons, for example, despite him being the first three weight champion. Leonard dominated an entire era of lightweights and beat some of the best welterweights. Moore gets in because of his longevity - forty something light heavyweight champion? Ten year reign. He'd come in at about #30 just for that alone, but the fact he was beating great middleweights and also several heavyweight contenders just backs up the fact. I like the Walker pick, but think he's too high. For me he's on the same level as Tony Canzoneri, one of the lesser legends at about #16. Muhammad Ali is too high, but I can't really argue as I'm outnumbered by about 20:1. But I like Robinson at #3.
Moore. Leonard is a miracle, but I like Fitzsimmons punching. Dropping some of the top men of the modern cruiserweight division when you are coming from a place where you would turn pro at the (modern) welerweight limit is completely off the hook. Fitzimmons is one of the hardest punchers of all time underneath 200lbs in spite of his massive disadvantage in size, and I consider him a serious HW puncher. He, too, beat great fighters in multiple divisions, from the all time top 20 MW Jack Dempsey to the all time top 20 HW James J Corbett. He beat great boxers and he smashed down durable bigger men considered punchers. Sometimes with one shot. His p4p criteria are absolutely cemented. But I have Leonard between 11 and 13 (and actually the first time I typed out that post, I had Fitzsimmons loose with those other boys, leaving spots 10, 11, 12 and 13 up for grabs) so I have no problem with seeing him ranked above Fitzsimmons. I do have a problem seeing him ranked above Langford. Langford smokes Leonard. A great fighter and if you're rating longevity highly (Which is totally reasonable) he is kicking the arse out of a spot, possibly. But he is also a fighter than tended to lose against the very best he faced, as often as not. The best fighters Moore faced beat him - Charles, Burley, Marciano, Patterson - although he has so many great wins and, as you say, longevity, I still rank him very very highly. I'm crazy about Mickey Walker. If there's a bad pick, that might be it. But if a guy turns pro at welter and steps into to out-fight an all time top 35 HW, he's special. Walker brought it through four divisions, and he took on everybody. I had Ali at #11 until this month. I had Robinson at #2 until this week.