Povetkin Pumpers: You've got some 'splainin' to do

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Saintpat, Sep 27, 2015.


  1. Beremith

    Beremith Active Member Full Member

    977
    162
    Feb 22, 2008
    Povetkin faced Chambers when he was still valid. That was way back in 2008. So, he has been facing quality opponents for a long time now.
     
  2. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,583
    9,149
    Oct 8, 2013
    ^ the key difference is nobody really values the WBA "regular" champion. So the defenses of that belt don't get put under much scrutiny. Were Povetkin's defenses sub par Yes. But there is a big difference between that belt and the "super" version of that title and the other 3 main belts.
    I view the WBA champion as Wlad K and don't really care who Chagaev defends his trinket against.
    To me and this is just my opinion it's worse to make bad defenses of the WBC title than the WBA regular belt. It just doesn't hold the same merit.
     
  3. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,232
    5,903
    Apr 30, 2006
    Hold up.

    So I'm supposed to buy that smaller heavyweights from the 70's and before would beat today's big men, but....

    -A Cruiserweight champion (in a deep division) with bigger dimensions than Joe Frazier moving up is worth ragging on as a defense?

    -That a man who was over 6'1 and 210 (close to Joe Louis size) gets counted as a LHW as a knock, when plenty of legit contenders (and no some champions) were actual LHW's or LHW sized?
     
  4. David HEY!!!

    David HEY!!! Guest

    I think the OP realized this after getting thrashed on this thread and ran away.

    Povetkin has never held a legit title.
     
  5. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,456
    28,962
    Jun 26, 2009
    By ran away you mean I went to sleep after midnight?

    I'm about to 'run away' again to work. But I'm still here.

    And, no, I think the comparison of title defense choices is quite valid. We see who and what kind of guys Sasha defended against when he held a belt.

    To those who think Povetkin will beat Wilder, more power to you. Difference of opinion is what makes a horserace.

    But on the specific point of what each has done in choosing opponents as champion, pretty much anyone who has addressed the comparison has to admit that Povetkin was a cherry-picker.
     
  6. David HEY!!!

    David HEY!!! Guest

    Valid huh? About as valid as any ibo nabf or intercontinental title.

    You need not twist things in your favor to justify your thread. Wlad is and was the WBA champ. There is no grey area.
     
  7. RememberingC.S.

    RememberingC.S. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,493
    89
    Oct 9, 2012
    exactly :oops:
     
  8. Stallion

    Stallion Son of Rome Full Member

    5,561
    348
    May 6, 2013
    :lol:

    Pianeta is better than both Duhaupas and especially Molina.

    Pianeta already beat Duhaupas and would do it again. He was legit top 20 at the time he fought Chagaev.

    Molina is a complete joke and not worth mentioning in the same sentence as Pianeta. Molina is probably the closest to what you call a cab driver level opponent.
     
  9. dan4579

    dan4579 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,269
    421
    Apr 11, 2011
    Oh yeah, it's pretty obvious that Povetkins "title reign" was a complete ****ing joke. As bad or worse than Wilders. Hopefully, after he brutally KO's Wilder he will not pull that same ****.
     
  10. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh!

    74,770
    42,204
    Sep 29, 2012
    Povetkin held the lightly regarded WBA-regular belt, that's the difference. Despite that he faced and beat guys like Chagaev, Huck, and Boswell. The WBC title is far more regarded than the WBA-REGULAR title, Wlad is the really WBA champ! Look's like OP logic backfired, because Pov defended a lesser belt, and still boasts far better defenses! :lol:
     
  11. Bollywooden

    Bollywooden Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,233
    642
    Jun 8, 2014
    OP is right, Povetkin won't be hood certified until he fights the great Dustin Nichols.
     
  12. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    And now he's 36, and because he kod Perez...they think that he's the shiznik. He's 36. slow and is a plodder with no boxing skills. The recent addition of PEDs might've made him look like a puncher, but he really isn't against anyone that can box.
     
  13. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,568
    1,279
    May 31, 2010
    Very true.

    Though in his defense, he was going thru promotional troubles and that manic Teddy Atlas wasnt doing anything for his confidence pulling him out fo the Klitschko fight during the presser.

    Had Potvetkin just gone ahead and fought Wlad back in the day, rather than waiting til 2013, he might have had another title shot vs Vitali, or possibly been fighting for the vacant title against Arreola instead of Stiverne. :think
     
  14. vnyc

    vnyc Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,078
    638
    Nov 8, 2009
    I was never impressed with povetkin , but wilder is a delusional can crusher . After watching his last fight I thought his footwork reminded me of Vitali who looked drunk at times , but wilder does not have defensive reflexes, volume, accuracy, ring IQ and I don't think he has the chin Vitali had
     
  15. Matt in a hat

    Matt in a hat Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,270
    7
    Nov 24, 2013
    Wilder's making some money. Good for him, and his family!
    My gripe is how he has been brought along. He's just now fighting guys he can learn from! Yeah it's good he's learning, but when Bowe fought Holyfield the first time he was ready!
    With Wilder there is some doubt about his preparation over the years due to his team selecting weak, or overly shop worn opponents that might have been good tests earlier in their careers.
    A Duhaupas fight in 2011, or 2012 would have been more appropriate.

    About Pov? He never was a champ. WBA regular? That's just the #1 contender belt, or as it is now, even less.
    I wish people would quit calling the REGULAR champions world champions.
    The belt is only used to advertise a "contender" as a champ to people who don't know any better, and collect sanctioning fees.