No, I'm not a fan of Wald's. The only heavyweight I come close to liking is Povetkin; and when he was active, Vitali Klitschko.
Would Wlad be a champion if he were say...6'1 230???? I think his great height and reach make him what he is... then again you have the julius longs of the world that plain suck ass
Good point, and what if Sam Peter were 5'6? If Tyson were only 5'4 he wouldn't have been as good, that much is certain.
u think he would fight tall if he wasnt? u think lennox would had been that great then? what if I had 3 arms, would I be allowed to box?
atsch I pointed out the obvious, Povetkin as some "talent" but is far from the new savior of the HW division, Wlad would completly destroy him, Alex as nothing that can get Wlads respect in the ring, and when u can make klit panic, thats when u can beat him, sorry to tell u this but Povetkin while being the guy that could possibly put a fight with him would not make him panic and surely not beat him. If u think I dont know boxing u maybe gonna look stupid when u try and debate about it.
Thompson is difficult for any fighter. I bet he surprises alot --esp. Peter and someone like Arreola. He's no bum.
I don't think Povetkin is going to beat Wlad, but I do think the fight will actually be pretty watchable seeing as their styles will mesh well.
You can't be serious, right? There is NO WAY IN HELL Povetkin is more exciting to watch than Samuel Peter. That could go down as "assinine statement of the year" on this forum. :-(
Please. I enjoy watching guys who know what the **** they're doing and actually throw punches and have some idea of how to box. Peter qualifies for none of the above.