For all you know AJ could lose against Parker and retire....his resume would therefore be more complete as opposed to a fighter who is continuing fighting, still winning and is not complete but as you say "pretty complete". Who are you to say what is "incomplete" and "pretty complete".
He never beat Pulev and has yet to fight Parker....I know you are an imbecile but please just stop right there. As for Wlad he was bordeline retired, 41yo and inactive. As a Wlad hater are you now claiming him as a great victory for your own desired needs? And I suggest you look up the meaning of "overall body of work".
"crowd" and defending of the current "WBC champion" is all I need to read to know where you're getting at.. Cut that **** out, its garbage.
Insults are the argument of the weak. You're angry cos you can't disprove what im saying. 1. It was Wlads choice to take time off. The fight was on the table in 2016 but he chose to wait until the following year. He had no problem with the inactivity so neither should you. 2. What body of work? He's been around for years and never beat a top 5 opponent . When AJ beats Parker he'll have beaten more top 10 ranted contenders than Povetkin in half the time. 3. Pulev never fought AJ because he is absolutely terrified of him. He had no issues fighting Wlad however. Wlad was better against AJ than he was against Povetkin.. If Wlad fought AJ like he did Povetkin he would have got pulverized in two rounds.. There a reason Wlad came in light and used movement. He knew bear hugging Joshua like he done Povetkin would equal early destruction.
Again you're looking too deep here. That's your interpretation of the word "crowd." and unfortunately for you it's not correct. Maybe you should cut the race baiting out? Nobody is doing it here except for YOU.
I've been on this forum for a long time and I know what the term "crowd" means on here.. You can try to be as subtle as you can about it mr. Mod from the lounge, but truth is you're just as bad as your lounge bucket buddies.
You're just mad that I called you out on your pathetic scorecard for Golovkin/Jacobs - Truth is you've lost the plot completely since you attacked me the Golovkin/Alvarez RBR(where you were absolutely losing your ****) Even notoriously unbiased posters thought you were acting like a baby. That's the real story here - Again you see what you want - but your perspective is warped.
I just don't like you, and id like to fight you so I could beat the **** out of you're 'high and mighty' ass.. That's all!
I'm not typing from behind a computer nor do i get on one at all, but I know that's where you're quite comfortable at while you spew your racial insinuations, that's for sure. Go ahead, breathe a sigh of relief asswipe.
Really, dude? Anybody that has fought about three dozen times over thirteen years will have a "better all-around resume than most" at heavy? Cuz, uh...I'm checking out Tye "Big Sky" Fields' record, and he fought 20x more than Povetkin, and even has 16 more wins, over the same thirteen year span, and uh...this **** ain't better than average. The best guy Fields ever fought KO1'ed him, and then in turn got KO1'ed by Povetvkin. The point is, of his 34 opponents, while not all were elites, most of them were at least digestible opposition for a front-of-the-pack heavyweight in the world title hunt by the recent standards of the division. Not like of 34, a majority of those were tomato cans. And through all that he only has one loss, against the universally recognized king of the division for the overwhelming bulk of that period.
You're just mad I shoved your "olive branch" so far up your ass, you're still shitting out splinters! Lol.. Isn't it time for your daily dose of steroids, little man?