1. No, not guilty since it wasn't banned. 2. We don't know yet. Atleast when Povetkin get caught they issue an investigation to find out. Wich is more than you can say they do in other cases.
Interesting interview on the scene. Stiverne implying that Povetkins team knew all week that he had tested positive. He said they kept repeating to him that they had a replacement if he didn't go through with the fight, days before the test came to light Why would you tell a guy that there's a replacement on standby when the guy was already in the country and after traveling 1000s of miles?? It's not like Stiverne had any other reason to bail
if that was the situation and they were saying that you can be sure stiverne and don king were trying to hussle them for more money, basically trying to extort them or the event is cancelled, the russians called their bluff
I was thinking this because his earlier posts suggested me and him were in agreement then all of a sudden the guy became hostile for no real reason. what a loser.
Lol @ this response. So they called his bluff by failing a drug test and having the WBC sanctioning removed, c'mon man even you gotta see how stupid that would be.
no i was replying to what limerickbox said, that they knew about the failed drug test all week and were saying to stiverne that they had a replacement lined up if that was the case you can be damn sure don king was using this as leverage to extort povetkin to get a higher purse or else they would leave. the russians were probably saying, thats cool you can do that we have a replacement anyway as limerickbox said stivernes story doesn't make any sense unless he was trying to extort them for more money for the fight. Which is something stiverne isn't going to say to the mdia because it will make him look bad and will destroy he's story that hw wouldn't face a drugs cheat. when in fact he would have had no problem doing it if they gave him more money
To be honest the story is bizarre I don't even know what Stiverne is alluding to because if they knew he would fail they would have postponed the fight and made up an injury excuse. But once again like with the Wilder situation we are talking about Povetkin basically blaming his opponent for the fight when really it his actions which has allowed his so called 'scared' opponent to pull out with a good reason.
povetkin wassn't to blame the first time round, it was either wilder running off before they came to a conclusion, or the wbc inability to read there own wada rule book this time if he popped for something it is povetkins fault.
why was stiverne allowed to fail a drug test weeks ago with just a tiny fine? shouldn't the wbc have pulled the sanctioning out after that?
What do you mean if? he tested positive end of story in my eyes, I am sure the WBC will 'investigate' which really means see how much they can get from Rybansky to give Povetkin the all clear.
he was under the wada allowed limit, 17 times under the limit, it was a non issue it would be like if the police took your blood alcohol and you tested 17 times under the allowed driving limit and they still kept you in the cells for 3 days to make sure that everything was above board.