Povetkin: Stiverne wanted a way out....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jmashyaka, Dec 18, 2016.


  1. jmashyaka

    jmashyaka Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,436
    4,030
    May 7, 2016
    No he had a reason he was informed Povetkin tested for a banned substance by the WBC. He did nothing wrong he wasn't the one caught with the substance, it seems your gripe is with the WBC. In which why did the Povetkin continue to fight for the WBC belt if he felt so hard done by? There are three other sanctioning body he could of competed for one of there belt.
     
  2. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    14,883
    10,943
    Oct 30, 2013
    povetkin was under the amount allowed by wada and vada he had no reason

    as i said before if you get stopped and breath checked by the police and your alchol levels are 17 times under the legal limit, should they be allowed to hold you in prison for 3 days just to make sure your clean?

    my gripe is with the obvious double standards and corruption exhibited by the wbc. what povetkin decided to do is he's business but as you said wilder walked away for no reason so povetkin might have a good case against him.
     
  3. jmashyaka

    jmashyaka Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,436
    4,030
    May 7, 2016
    Corruption usually favours the richer party which in this case is Povetkins promoter. Povetkin has no case against wilder, with your arguement he has one against the WBC for informing Wilder with misinformation which lead to his withdrawal.

    Well if Povetkin who should feel hard done by didn't do anything or say anything about the WBC handling of the case, what does that infer?
     
  4. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    14,883
    10,943
    Oct 30, 2013
    thats not true, you can see how badly povetkin was treated compared to how stiverne was treated, you can't blindly say corruption usualyl favours the richer party .

    and you havn't answered my question , if the police stop you and you test 17 times under the drink driving limit should you be kept in the cells for 3 days so they can make sure everything is okay?.

    how do you know they informed wilder with misinformation? if they simply said povetkin tested postive for meldonium, then it wasn't mis information, if wilders team was too stupid to realise they were 17 times under the allowed limit and didn't look it up thats their fault
     
  5. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,327
    Aug 27, 2011
    pedvetkin should just shut his roided gums
     
    jmashyaka likes this.
  6. jmashyaka

    jmashyaka Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,436
    4,030
    May 7, 2016
    Because if they told Wilder, Povetkin tested for Meldonium but it was under the limit so technically he hasn't failed anything so if you withdraw we will strip you then that would have been right according to you. But instead they said he failed and were gunna investigate it, and Wilder said well I'm not fighting him if he has any type of advantage no matter how little and the WBC did nothing about it.

    Yet Povetkin's team are even more stupid that they get mistreated by the WBC but yet continue tryna fight for the WBC belt loool
     
  7. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    14,883
    10,943
    Oct 30, 2013
    they never said he failed a drugs test, and every media outlet were careful to report that there was no actual failed drugs test because they didn't want to get sued for lying. they said stuff like tested postive for meldonium

    its something that was highlighted at the time the media and everyone involved were very careful how they worded it and made sure not to say that he actually failed a test because they were afraid of getting sued for lying

    well the stiverne fight was basically for the interim belt so why not go for it but i do argee with you on that
     
  8. jmashyaka

    jmashyaka Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,436
    4,030
    May 7, 2016
    Okay I'll rephrase it to he tested positive for meldonium.

    Lool but it don't make sense Povetkin can fight for any of the belt but he decides to go for the sanctioning body that have mistreated him and basically tarnished his reputation?
     
  9. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    14,883
    10,943
    Oct 30, 2013
    they can notify him of that, but that would give him zero reason to cancel the fight, thus the blame would be on wilder.

    povetkin put a lot of work into becoming the wbc mandatory im sure he wanted to finish the job. but ya im sure he will go after another belt now
     
  10. jmashyaka

    jmashyaka Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,436
    4,030
    May 7, 2016
    If the blame was with Wilder the WBC would of stripped him but they didn't.

    Lol finish what he started with an organisation that mistreated him hmm that makes sense. He has no choice now hopefully they ban this clown for years to come. If I was a fighter I would not come anywhere near him especially if Vada isn't involved.
     
  11. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    14,883
    10,943
    Oct 30, 2013
    the wbc aren't going to strip wilder lol come on they love him, 5 voluntary defenses in a row? the man can do no wrong in their eyes,

    the wbc's favourism of wilder goes back to when he got the title shot, some fighters had already gone through multiple eliminators, all wilder had to do was watch scuba scott fall and he was made mandatory straight away
     
  12. jmashyaka

    jmashyaka Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,436
    4,030
    May 7, 2016
    The wbc love money. Povetkin was the mandatory so after that fell apart he got to fight another voluntary.

    I'm not even a big fan of wilder, his fights are entertaining because he's vunerable but carries big power and he thought Stiverne for the title it wasnt just handed to him.
     
  13. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    14,883
    10,943
    Oct 30, 2013
    wilder was gifted a final eliminator against scuba scott who was already stopped by dereck chisora and became mandatory. fury had already been in i think two final eliminators at that stage and the wbc over looked him, fury went crazy about it.

    they favoured wilder and have allowed him to fight bum after bum since
     
  14. jmashyaka

    jmashyaka Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,436
    4,030
    May 7, 2016
    lol I'm not here to defend Wilder or the WBC, I'll only defend wilders action in the Povetkin situation. The WBC are crooks and Povetkin is a cheat that would be my summary of this situation.
     
    KiwiMan likes this.
  15. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    14,883
    10,943
    Oct 30, 2013
    i agree, povetkin didnt cheat in the meldonium case, but in this new case it does look rpretty damning