Povetkin-Takam------>Wilder-Stiverne

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by WildStyle, Jan 17, 2015.


  1. WildStyle

    WildStyle J.C. Penny's belt $2.99 banned

    8,578
    5
    Sep 24, 2011
  2. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,469
    Jan 10, 2007
    Both were good fights, but in Pov vs Takam fight there was a spectecular KO so it had better ending
     
  3. TerryESB

    TerryESB The Final Boss Full Member

    13,376
    434
    May 4, 2009
    Povetkin and Takem have talent. Wilder and Stiverne don't. It is that simple.

    Stiverne fought the laziest plodding fight I have seen in decades from a HW title fight from a so called champ. He had zero ability to cut off the ring. He just followed Wilder around and wouldn't let his hands go. It was total ****e to be honest
     
  4. Leoh

    Leoh Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,749
    1,239
    Dec 19, 2014
    Povetkin vs Takam was a fight between 2 well established boxers. Wilder is still a few steps away from that status, but he's getting there.
     
  5. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,469
    Jan 10, 2007
    They all have talent. Wilder is the most gifted between them all with height, reach, good reflexes and speed.

    Povetkin is the most proven of all. As of talent, Povetkin looked awful and talentless vs cruiser Marco Huck, who isn't anything special in terms of skills, but almost stopped him in 7th round. Just a bad night for Sasha. All of these four in their top shape would beat Huck
     
  6. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,469
    Jan 10, 2007
    Takam had 2 good performances, old Thompson and Perez, he wasn't much more proven than Wilder is now.