I quite agree with you,mate! Watch Wach vs Hammer and then Fury vs Hammer! Wach is no top 10 fighter but due to his size and his punch he is a threat to most big boys out there, even to the better ones. It makes me think that Povetkin took on someone like Wach whereas Wilder has faced the likes of Molina and Duhaupas in his title defences.Wach is far better than Molina and Duhaupas,and there was no need for Povetkin to fight Wach as he had already been named the mandatory for Wilder.I take my hat off to Povetkin for his choice of opponents.Wawryzk,Takam,Charr,Perez and Wach since he lost to Wlad.Extremely impressive performances and quite convincing victories.
****en pathetic, lmao. I give him the Chagaev, Chambers and Huck. The rest you can ball up and throw in the garbage.
Rahman fight was a mother****ing joke!! Washed up, fat, unmotivated. Sasha's a good fighter but that fight doesn't even count IMO
What about Takam??? Garbage,eh!! Or what about Wach? He is better than any opponent Wilder has faced so far with the exception of Stiverne. What about Perez and Byrd? Garbage,too????
Modern day boxing at heavyweight isn't great all around, which makes threads like this on the silly side but that's expected here. If you want to compare what would be journeymen in better eras be my guest. Would be a waste though.