PPV ultimate question.....

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by brown bomber, Jul 24, 2009.

  1. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Messages:
    30,856
    Likes Received:
    17
    Which fights/ Fighters would you actually pay to see..... After the recent PPV piece of **** cards who is worthy of your buck? Who is worth paying £45 for?

    Me i'd pay for
    Valuev - Haye.....
    Hatton - Khan....
    Cotto - Pac.....
    Mayweather - marquez......
    Klitschko - Klitschko.....
    Khan - Witter......

    I'd be a bit pissed about Witter-Khan, Klit- Klit and Marquez- Mayweather just because I don't feel they're that attractive action wise.... however i'd pay to make them happen.

    There is zero chance of me ever buying a PPV on sky other then this.....

    If they think i'll pay for Khan-Morales etc they can kiss my semi irish arse.
     
  2. mckay_89

    mckay_89 Haw you! Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    4,600
    Likes Received:
    23
    I'm on the same boat as you Jeff, I'd also pay for the Cotto/Pac winner vs JMM/PBF winner, Haye vs either Klit, Vazquez V Rafa Marquez 4 and probably a good few others.
     
  3. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    17,612
    Likes Received:
    3
    I'd pay for Khan vs Murray
    Khan vs salita
    Khan vs Paulie Mal
     
  4. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Messages:
    30,856
    Likes Received:
    17
    :shock:GTFO here dan :lol:
     
  5. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    26,593
    Likes Received:
    5
    With Khan it depends on the undercard and who he is facing.

    Haye I will pay for.

    World class 'superfights' like Mayweather vs JMM and Pac vs Cotto I will also pay for.
     
  6. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Messages:
    30,856
    Likes Received:
    17
    Khan Murray... yes i'd pay for that even though it is at this stage a domestic fight.
     
  7. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    28,342
    Likes Received:
    0
    its not just about the main event.

    any UK show should have a top US card follow on. Any US Card should have a decent UK card before. This way you get 6hours plus of viewing. the Khan card we paid £5 an hour. Its a joke.

    We should have at least 2 world title fights or better (hatton vs pac not world title but better) on each card, and at least 3 domestic euro title fights. Minimum of 6 live fights.
     
  8. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    17,612
    Likes Received:
    3
    :rofl seriously though last Saturday if they'd have shown all the fights ie.

    Mitchell
    Enzo
    Smith
    Hall/Small
    Saunders
    Gavin
    DeGale
    Khan

    and it would have been live.....Would you not have been tempted Jeff
     
  9. Losfer_Words

    Losfer_Words Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    11,385
    Likes Received:
    1
    Personally, I'm a sucker for watching fights somewhere comfortable, like on the sofa, and I would rather watch a UK PPV card on TV than on a stream. I usually split the cost with my mate and that means I only pay 7 and a half squids so I don't have much of an issue debating it really.
     
  10. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    28,342
    Likes Received:
    0
    surley it be for the world title??
     
  11. PrideOfWales

    PrideOfWales Winston Zedmore Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2006
    Messages:
    11,684
    Likes Received:
    1
    Froch - Kessler
    Froch - Pavlik
    Haye - Klitschko (either)
    Hatton - Khan
    Mayweather - Pacman

    I'd probably fork out for these... £45 is a bit steep though.

    Also, not that I'm trying to give Sky ideas but I'd consider paying something like £50 for a season ticket for this Super Six Series to see all of the fights. They could really go to town on something like this.
     
  12. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    17,612
    Likes Received:
    3
    Jeff did you get my PM or had a look at the becoming a trainer thread. I've found a course which wanted to know if its a decent one ?
     
  13. Losfer_Words

    Losfer_Words Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    11,385
    Likes Received:
    1
    :goodMakes complete sense. They wouldn't do it, though:-(.
     
  14. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    28,342
    Likes Received:
    0
    i think Sky should scrap sky box office and sky sports xtra, and introduce a premium sports channel, and additional amount each month or you by events as a ppv.
     
  15. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Messages:
    30,856
    Likes Received:
    17
    Absolutely not. Its not about the money- its the principle. I'm lucky £15 doesn't mean a great deal to me. Lets lay out the facts here...

    Mitchell fought some unknown black dude.... can't even remember what country he was from. Beating him has done nothing to change my opinion about Mitchell. The match was a risky waste of time. What if the foreign chap had have won? He had no form of note Mitchell may has well have fought Danny Thorpe again. Pointless match.

    Enzo fought a world rated largely unknown quantity and got smashed to pieces. Did we know that was going to happen? No... did we really care if Enzo won or lost? Not really. We wanted him to win but if he had have won by a KO in 1 second whose to know how good or bad this russian was? He may as well have fought Tony Booth. Pointless, stupid match.

    Paul Smith... Cracking fighter.... really, really good to watch. Who was he fighting? Some russian dude, some slovakian? I Don't know who he was fighting but he just added 10 rounds of wear and tear on his body and for what? a plus one in the win column? Why isn't he in the Dodson-Quigley-Magee mix.... they say he is... but he's fighting zerkkei zamstenenberger.... This lad should be up there with the top names in the division but he has spent most of his career maeking time. Pointless, stupid match.

    Hall-Small.. great match. Both had form going in, both came for the victory not the pay check. Small spiced things up by acting a tit. Brilliant. Hall paced the ring at the start of the fight and Small stood there with all his trainers next to him... it was a surreal start to a quality DOMESTIC match up. Stick that on at the velodrome or Bethnal green and they would have had the limelight all to themselves instead of propping up a sub standard bill. The fight saved the show. great fight, great match up.

    Saunders - can't remember..... Fair performance. Think it was a british guy. Horrible mismatch, typical overmatched journeyman stoppage. plus one in the win column should have been the walk in fight. fair match at this stage. Scriven is a tough campaigner. Fair play.... not a chief support bout.

    Gavin boxed well same as above, his opponent gave it a good go but who was he.... handpicked for his lack of any outstanding attribute. Fair match not a chief support.

    Degale- Irish chap. As above step in the right direction (UK opposition). Someones listening. But not a chief support on PPV.

    Khan-Kotelnik- good match up on the fringes of a pretty empty division in terms of established talent. Not PPV worthy. Not particuarly entertaining. Well boxed but I think 2 more performances like that and Khan will turn into the Vladimer klitchko of the light welter weight division. Stealing fights. Impressive once or twice but if its going to be like that every time i'll catch the repeat the week after.

    That is the truth.