PPV's are good for boxing. The sport thrives on it.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jacory Harris, Jul 31, 2014.


  1. Jacory Harris

    Jacory Harris I'm a gorilla I'm a dawg! Full Member

    7,906
    32
    Dec 30, 2009
    It's really quite simple. No PPV's, no good competitive matchups. In the grand scheme of things PPV's are good for the sport. :deal
     
  2. El-blanco

    El-blanco Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,241
    0
    Apr 28, 2014
    So your solution to shitty match making is ppvs? Brilliant.
     
  3. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    PPVs arent just for top match ups, its also for airing shows other networks wouldnt put up money for
     
  4. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    Did you forget to log in under your other account, MVC?
     
  5. Jacory Harris

    Jacory Harris I'm a gorilla I'm a dawg! Full Member

    7,906
    32
    Dec 30, 2009
    I'm not MVC.
     
  6. kovalevtheGoat

    kovalevtheGoat The Chelyabinsk Machine banned Full Member

    5,600
    78
    Jul 28, 2014
    markq aswell
     
  7. Phanekim

    Phanekim Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,929
    8
    Jan 6, 2007
    this issue is very complex. very. with that said, ppv has a purpose and a role. this role is changing as cable cartels lose power and cord cutting becomes more relevant.
     
  8. MannySteward

    MannySteward Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,660
    4
    May 1, 2011
    Translation of TS argument:

    'PPV's are good for boxing because i say so. I offer no evidence or analysis in support of this argument; just take my word for it yo'
     
  9. Dementia Pugulistica

    Dementia Pugulistica Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,090
    1,251
    Nov 24, 2005
    At the rate PPV prices are increasing they'll hit the 100$ mark in the next 10 years. I don't believe this is a good thing because the price point demographic is getting smaller and smaller. The overall trend is diminishing PPV sales across the board. Low numbers for Mayweather and Pacquaio two of the most popular fighters in the game right now, and the blame is being placed on the match making. I think it has more to do with the push to 70$ price tags combined with fights that are clearly considered not PPV worthy by the paying fans. They're pricing themselves out of the market and when fewer and fewer fans watch your product it's not a good thing. I really can't see how a 70ppv that is bought by less than a million people grows the sport. Diminishing exposure can't be a good thing.
     
  10. DABOZ

    DABOZ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,759
    0
    Mar 5, 2012
    PPVs = too much ducking.
     
  11. yalipito

    yalipito Member Full Member

    201
    0
    Dec 3, 2005
    Enough said.
     
  12. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,453
    7
    Apr 26, 2010
    PPV was unheard of in the golden age of boxing AND everybody fought each other. Not sure how you came to your conclusion. PPV is killing the sport in the USA. **** has been going down hill since Tyson/King when PPV really took off. Boxing is barely a top 10 sport anymore. Sure Floyd and maybe a couple more make big bucks but that is coming to an end.

    I think boxing flourishes and will continue to flourish outside of the USA because PPV is reasonably priced and/or fights are free. Keep in mind, the most popular sports in the world aren't PPV.
     
  13. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,890
    Apr 14, 2009
    PPV is killing the sport.
     
  14. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    Not this many damn PPVs.
     
  15. Matt in a hat

    Matt in a hat Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,270
    7
    Nov 24, 2013
    Then your eltirado.
    Do we get a rainbow thread about Wilder being better than George Foreman, already!:bbb:boxer:boxer:boxer:bbb